...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology >Comparison of dragging ablation and point-by-point ablation with a laser balloon on linear lesion formation
【24h】

Comparison of dragging ablation and point-by-point ablation with a laser balloon on linear lesion formation

机译:用激光球囊拖曳消融和点点消融对线性病变形成的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction Lesion size and continuity in dragging laser balloon (LB) ablation, which may enable fast and durable pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation, are unknown. We evaluated the differences in size and continuity of linear lesions formed by dragging ablation and conventional point-by-point ablation using an LB in vitro model. Methods and Results Chicken muscles were cauterized using the first-generation LB in dragging and point-by-point fashion. Dragging ablation was manually performed with different dragging speeds (0.5-2 degrees/s) using an overlap ratio of the beginning and last site during one application at 12 W/20 s and 8.5 W/30 s. Point-by-point ablation was performed with 25% and 50% overlap ratios at six energy settings (5.5 W/30 s to 12 W/20 s). Lesion depth, width, and continuity were compared. Lesion continuity was assessed by the surface and deep visible gap degree categorized from 1 (perfect) to 3 (poor). Twenty lesions were evaluated for each ablation protocol. Lesion depth and width in dragging ablation at high power (12 W) were comparable with most measurements in point-by-point ablation. Lesion depth and width were smaller at faster-dragging speed and lower power (8.5 W) in dragging ablation. The surface visible gap degree was better in dragging ablation at all dragging speeds than a 25% overlapped point-by-point ablation (p < .001). Conclusion Dragging LB ablation at high power provides deep and continuous linear lesion formation comparable with that of point-by-point LB ablation. However, lesion depth and width depending on the dragging speed and power.
机译:导言:拖拽式激光球囊(LB)消融术中的病变大小和连续性尚不清楚,这种消融术可以快速、持久地隔离心房颤动患者的肺静脉。我们使用LB体外模型评估了拖动消融和传统逐点消融形成的线性病变在大小和连续性方面的差异。方法与结果采用第一代LB拖拽逐点烧灼鸡肌肉。在12 W/20 s和8.5 W/30 s的一次应用中,以不同的拖动速度(0.5-2度/秒)手动执行拖动消融,使用起始和最后位置的重叠率。在六种能量设置(5.5 W/30 s至12 W/20 s)下,以25%和50%的重叠率逐点进行消融。比较病变深度、宽度和连续性。病变的连续性通过表面和深可见间隙度进行评估,间隙度从1级(完美)到3级(差)。每种消融方案评估20个病灶。高功率(12 W)下拖动消融的病灶深度和宽度与逐点消融的大多数测量值相当。拖拽速度越快,拖拽消融功率越低(8.5W),病灶深度和宽度越小。在所有拖拽速度下,拖拽消融的表面可见间隙度优于25%重叠逐点消融(p<0.001)。结论高功率拖拽式LB消融可形成与逐点LB消融相当的深而连续的线性病变。然而,病变的深度和宽度取决于拖动速度和功率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号