首页> 外文期刊>The journal of asthma >Treatment patterns among non-active users of maintenance asthma medication in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
【24h】

Treatment patterns among non-active users of maintenance asthma medication in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

机译:联合王国维持哮喘药物的非活性使用者的治疗模式:临床实践研究数据链接的回顾性队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and healthcare utilization (HCU) of non-active users of maintenance asthma medications in the United Kingdom. Methods: Retrospective, cohort analysis of patients with asthma, aged >= 6 years who were non-active users of maintenance therapy (no prescription for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), combined ICS/long-acting beta agonists (ICS/LABA) or 'other' bronchodilatory therapies in last 12 months) were identified in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2012-2015) and followed-up for 2 years after a new prescription for an asthma maintenance medication (index date). Patient characteristics, most common maintenance treatment sequences and HCU were described. Results: 55,293 patients were identified (ICS: 46,297, ICS/LABA: 8,367; Other: 629). Mean age was 37 years and 56% were female. During follow-up, the most common treatment sequences across groups implied intermittent use, comprising periods of maintenance therapy interspersed with maintenance-free periods. During year 1 and year 2 of follow-up, the proportion of patients prescribed OCS was 19% and 13%, prescribed >= 4 short-acting bronchodilators (SABD) was 24% and 19%, having >= 3 asthma-related primary care consultations/year was 59% and 36% and experiencing >= 1 exacerbation/year was 15% and 11%, respectively. Conclusions: In previously non-active users of asthma maintenance medication subsequently commenced on maintenance therapy, intermittent use was common during the 2-year follow-up despite the potential need for regular use as evidenced by patient HCU and SABD usage patterns. This highlights the need for regular patient assessment and education on medication adherence to ensure appropriateness of prescribing to maintain asthma control.
机译:目的:描述英国非活跃哮喘维持药物使用者的患者特征、治疗模式和医疗利用率(HCU)。方法:对年龄大于等于6岁的哮喘患者进行回顾性队列分析,这些患者均未积极使用维持疗法(无吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)处方),在临床实践研究数据链(2012-2015)中确定了ICS/长效β-激动剂(ICS/LABA)或“其他”支气管扩张疗法(过去12个月)的组合,并在新的哮喘维持药物处方(索引日期)后随访了2年。描述了患者特征、最常见的维持治疗顺序和HCU。结果:确定了55293名患者(ICS:46297,ICS/LABA:8367;其他:629)。平均年龄为37岁,56%为女性。在随访期间,各组间最常见的治疗顺序是间歇性使用,包括维持治疗期和无维持期。在随访的第1年和第2年,开OCS的患者比例分别为19%和13%,开>=4种短效支气管扩张剂(SABD)的患者比例分别为24%和19%,每年进行>=3次哮喘相关初级保健咨询的患者比例分别为59%和36%,每年经历>=1次病情恶化的患者比例分别为15%和11%。结论:在之前未积极使用哮喘维持药物的患者中,随后开始进行维持治疗,尽管患者HCU和SABD的使用模式表明可能需要定期使用,但在2年的随访期间,间歇性使用仍然很常见。这突出表明,需要定期对患者进行药物依从性评估和教育,以确保维持哮喘控制的处方的适当性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号