首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >Can calcined bones be used to date Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic open-air sites? A case-study from the Scheldt basin (NW Belgium)
【24h】

Can calcined bones be used to date Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic open-air sites? A case-study from the Scheldt basin (NW Belgium)

机译:煅烧骨骼可用于迄今为止最终的古石英和沉思的露天场地? Scheldt盆地(NW Belgium)的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents the results of an inter-comparative study in view of assessing the reliability of radiocarbon dates obtained on calcined bones from open-air Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sites. The results demonstrate that the success rate is largely dependent on site-taphonomy, in particular the speed of covering of the site. Sites quickly covered by aeolian, alluvial or marine sediments yield on average good dating results. At worst they can be affected by an wood-age offset, generally <100 years, caused by the uptake of carbon from the firewood. Sites which are uncovered or have been covered rather late suffer from contamination problems resulting in radiocarbon dates much younger than the reference dates. For these sites, which unfortunately represent the vast majority of open-air Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sites, calcined bones are not a valuable dating material for developing robust, decadal-to-centennial chronologies.
机译:本文介绍了一项相互比较研究的结果,以评估在露天旧石器时代和中石器时代遗址的煅烧骨骼上获得的放射性碳日期的可靠性。结果表明,成功率在很大程度上取决于现场挖掘,尤其是现场覆盖的速度。被风成、冲积或海洋沉积物迅速覆盖的地点平均产生了良好的年代测定结果。在最坏的情况下,它们可能会受到木柴吸收碳引起的木龄偏移的影响,通常小于100年。未被发现或覆盖时间较晚的地点受到污染问题的影响,导致放射性碳日期比参考日期早得多。不幸的是,这些遗址代表了绝大多数露天旧石器时代和中石器时代遗址,对于这些遗址而言,煅烧的骨骼并不是一种有价值的年代测定材料,无法用于发展强健的、从十年到百年的年代表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号