首页> 外文期刊>Journal of aging studies >Advanced old age as a developmental dilemma: An in-depth comparison of established fourth age conceptualizations
【24h】

Advanced old age as a developmental dilemma: An in-depth comparison of established fourth age conceptualizations

机译:高级旧时代作为发展困境:深入比较已建立的第四次概念化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Distinguishing the Fourth Age (FoA) from the Third Age (ThA) has become a common practice in aging research. In this theoretical paper, we focus on four established conceptualizations of the ThA-FoA distinction, i.e., (1) Neugarten's work on the young-old vs. the old-old; (2) Laslett's concept of the innovative life period of the ThA; (3) Erikson's 9th life stage approach; and (4) Baltes' approach considering the FoA as the most radical incompleteness of the human condition. After a comparative descriptive analysis, we extract evaluative elements inherent in the four approaches according to six categories: (1) fundamental values; (2) positive evaluative elements; (3) negative evaluative elements; (4) the decline vs. growth view; (5) the continuity vs. discontinuity view; and (6) values related to practical issues. As an overarching result of our analysis, we conclude that all conceptions face - in different ways - dilemmas that seem difficult to solve. One option may be to give up all ambitions toward agency for the FoA and indeed qualify this phase as the "aging without agency" phase of life. Doing so, however, seems ethically questionable, because it would give up acknowledged values connected with a good human life such as human goal-directed autonomy and freedom. In conclusion, the ThA-FoA distinction, although arguably a needed and helpful roadmap for the recent decades of aging science, comes with enduring disadvantages and eventually even risks. Therefore, in future aging science, we recommend avoiding the ThAFoA distinction or at least using it only in combination with a critical attitude.
机译:区分第四年龄(FoA)和第三年龄(ThA)已成为老龄化研究中的常见做法。在这篇理论论文中,我们关注四个已确立的ThA FoA区分概念,即:(1)纽加滕关于年轻人与老年人的工作;(2) Laslett关于ThA创新生命周期的概念;(3) 埃里克森的第九人生阶段方法;(4)Baltes的方法认为FoA是人类条件最根本的不完全性。通过比较描述性分析,我们根据六个类别提取了四种方法中固有的评价要素:(1)基本价值观;(2) 积极的评价因素;(3) 消极评价因素;(4) 衰退与增长观;(5) 连续与不连续的观点;(6)与实际问题相关的价值观。作为我们分析的总体结果,我们得出结论,所有概念都以不同的方式面临着似乎难以解决的困境。一种选择可能是放弃对FoA代理的所有野心,并将这一阶段定义为生命中的“没有代理的老化”阶段。然而,这样做似乎在伦理上有问题,因为它会放弃与美好人类生活相关的公认价值观,比如人类目标导向的自主和自由。总之,ThA FoA的区别,虽然可以说是近几十年老龄化科学所需要和有益的路线图,但却带来了持久的缺点,最终甚至是风险。因此,在未来的老龄化科学中,我们建议避免使用ThAFoA区别,或者至少只在结合批判态度时使用它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号