首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Engineering >Thermal Analysis of Solar Tunnel Dryer and Evaluation for Commercial Mango Leather Drying
【24h】

Thermal Analysis of Solar Tunnel Dryer and Evaluation for Commercial Mango Leather Drying

机译:太阳能隧道烘干机的热分析和商业芒果皮革干燥评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A walk-in type semi-cylindrical shaped solar tunnel dryer (10mx3.75m) was designed; developed and evaluated at Dr. B.S. Konakan Krishi Vidyapeeth; Dapoli for thermal analysis. The dryer was evaluated by conducting no-load test at laboratory to study the thermal profile; energy input/output during the winter and summer season. Based on the laboratory experience; a commercial scale solar tunnel dryer was installed and evaluated at M/s Shirodkar Food Products Pvt. Ltd.; kudal; District Sindhudurg (MS) for commercial mango leather drying. The dryer was loaded with 250 kg mango pulp per batch by spreading over 210 number of grease-proof aluminium trays (1.2 kg pulp in each tray) in three layers (70 trays in each layer). Drying of mango leather was studied in comparison with open sun drying and electrical oven drying for time saving and energy consumption. The study revealed that the average rise in temperature of drying air was about 18 -22 °C over the ambient air. The average drying period reduced by28 % over open sun drying method. The average temperature inside the solar dryer was 62+5 °C, and required 10 h for upper layer of trays, 13 h for second layer of trays, and 17 h for third level of trays as compared to 26 h in open sun drying. The operating energy cost of solar tunnel dryer was zero as compared to 102 kWh in electrical oven. Considering drying of 30 batches per season, the payback period of the system was 2.7 years.
机译:设计了一台步入式半圆柱形太阳能隧道干燥机(10mx3.75m);由B.S.Konakan Krishi Vidyapeeth博士开发和评估;用于热分析的Dapoli。通过在实验室进行空载试验来评估干燥器,以研究其热分布;冬季和夏季的能量输入/输出。基于实验室经验;在M/s Shirodkar Food Products Pvt.Ltd.安装并评估了商业规模的太阳能隧道干燥机。;库达尔;新罕布什尔州(MS)商业芒果皮革干燥区。烘干机每批装载250千克芒果果肉,方法是将210多个防油铝托盘(每个托盘1.2千克果肉)分三层(每层70个托盘)摊铺。对芒果皮的干燥进行了研究,并与开放式太阳干燥和电烤箱干燥进行了比较。研究表明,干燥空气的平均温升约为18-22°C。平均干燥周期比露台干燥缩短28%。太阳能干燥器内的平均温度为62+5°C,上层托盘需要10小时,第二层托盘需要13小时,第三层托盘需要17小时,而在开放式太阳干燥中需要26小时。太阳能隧道式干燥机的运行能源成本为零,而电烤箱的运行能源成本为102 kWh。考虑到每季度干燥30批,该系统的投资回收期为2.7年。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号