首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Proposals for Engaging Patients and Healthcare Professionals in Risk Minimisation from an Analysis of Stakeholder Input to the EU Valproate Assessment Using the Novel Analysing Stakeholder Safety Engagement Tool (ASSET)
【24h】

Proposals for Engaging Patients and Healthcare Professionals in Risk Minimisation from an Analysis of Stakeholder Input to the EU Valproate Assessment Using the Novel Analysing Stakeholder Safety Engagement Tool (ASSET)

机译:使用小说分析利益相关者安全订婚工具(资产)分析利益攸关方评估利益攸关方投入的利益攸关方投入的患者和医疗保健专业人员的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction Understanding the impact of regulatory actions for medicines and enablers/barriers for positive health outcomes is fundamental to effective risk minimisation measures (RMM). Therefore, the Impact Strategy of the European Union (EU) Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) includes engagement with patient communities and healthcare professional (HCP) bodies regarding RMM. However, there is uncertainty on how best to obtain stakeholder input. Objectives The objectives of this study were to (1) analyse stakeholder input at a public hearing and dedicated meeting for the 2017-18 EU procedure on valproate teratogenicity and (2) draw proposals for enhancing PRAC engagement. Methods For the content analysis, the novel 'Analysing Stakeholder Safety Engagement Tool' (ASSET) was developed with 21 themes in six domains (appropriateness, access, audience, compatibility, integrability, time), based on implementation theories. Results Stakeholders provided a wide range of RMM proposals, some beyond the regulatory remit. Patients and most HCPs converged remarkably, but there was some divergence among HCPs on the informed choice objective, the therapeutic place of valproate, the RMM appropriateness, and RMM delivery to HCPs and patients. Ethical aspects emerged as relevant for regulatory decision making, and crucial input gaps were identified from an RMM implementation perspective. Nine pilotable proposals for PRAC were made regarding: (A) Agreeing on appropriate RMM with stakeholders and catalysing healthcare leadership for implementation; (B) Building-up stakeholder input on all elements critical to RMM implementation guided by the ASSET; and (C) Collaborating with all stakeholders for monitoring implementation and evaluating RMM. Conclusions New implementation theory-based approaches are promising for enhancing the valuable dialogue between regulators, patients and HCPs and achieving patient safety. EU PAS Register number: EUPAS35947
机译:导言了解药品监管行动的影响以及积极健康结果的促成因素/障碍对于有效的风险最小化措施(RMM)至关重要。因此,欧盟(EU)药物警戒风险评估委员会(PRAC)的影响战略包括与患者社区和医疗专业人员(HCP)机构就RMM进行接触。然而,如何最好地获得利益相关者的投入还存在不确定性。目标本研究的目的是(1)分析利益相关者在2017-18欧盟丙戊酸钠致畸性程序的公开听证会和专门会议上的投入,(2)提出加强PRAC参与的建议。在内容分析方面,基于实施理论,开发了新颖的“分析利益相关者安全参与工具”(ASSET),包括六个领域的21个主题(适当性、可访问性、受众、兼容性、可集成性、时间)。结果利益相关者提供了广泛的RMM提案,其中一些超出了监管范围。患者和大多数HCP显著趋同,但HCP之间在知情选择目标、丙戊酸钠的治疗部位、RMM的适用性以及RMM对HCP和患者的交付方面存在一些分歧。伦理方面与监管决策相关,从RMM实施的角度确定了关键的投入差距。针对PRAC提出了九项可试行的建议:(A)与利益相关者就适当的RMM达成一致,并促进医疗保健领导层的实施;(B) 建立利益相关者在资产指导下对RMM实施至关重要的所有要素的投入;(C)与所有利益相关者合作,监控RMM的实施和评估。结论基于实施理论的新方法有望加强监管机构、患者和医务人员之间有价值的对话,实现患者安全。欧盟PAS注册号:EUPAS35947

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号