...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug and alcohol review >US national treatment admissions with opioids and benzodiazepines
【24h】

US national treatment admissions with opioids and benzodiazepines

机译:美国国家治疗录取阿片类药物和苯并二氮杂卓

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction and Aims Opioids and benzodiazepines (O/BZD) are increasingly involved in drug overdose deaths in the USA. Expanding treatment capacity may reduce these deaths. Knowledge about co-occurring O/BZD admissions compared to opioid admissions (opioid) is needed to plan this expansion. Design and Methods US treatment admissions to specialty facilities for 2011-2017 were analysed for trends and 2017 for group differences. Due to 1.9 million admissions in 2017, comparisons between O/BZD and opioid admissions were summarised as effect sizes. Additional analysis compared the administratively pre-coded category 'other opiates and synthetics' to other opiates and synthetics/benzodiazepines admissions to control for possible similarity in drug source. Differences within O/BZD admissions by primary drug were explored. Results Although opioid admissions showed a steady increase over time (25.9% to 38.2%), O/BZD admissions showed increases until decline in 2017 (3.2% to 4.0%). In 2017 no factor reached moderate effect size (>= 0.2) in group comparisons or within the O/BZD admissions. Heroin was self-reported in 70% of both O/BZD and opioid admissions. Discussion and Conclusions No meaningful US national differences on data routinely collected were found for O/BZD compared to opioid admissions including the subgroup with other opiates and synthetics only. Efforts to expand existing opioid treatment in specialty treatments may help reduce opioid and O/BZD deaths. However, the analysis could not address whether changes in treatment would improve outcomes.
机译:简介与目的在美国,阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物(O/BZD)越来越多地参与药物过量死亡。扩大治疗能力可能会减少这些死亡。与阿片类药物(阿片类药物)相比,需要了解同时发生的O/BZD入院情况,以规划这一扩张。设计和方法分析2011-2017年美国专科医疗机构住院治疗的趋势,并分析2017年的组间差异。由于2017年有190万例入院,O/BZD和阿片类药物入院之间的比较总结为效应大小。其他分析比较了行政预编码类别“其他阿片剂和合成药物”与其他阿片剂和合成药物/苯二氮卓类药物,以控制药物来源的可能相似性。探讨了按主要药物分类的O/BZD入院率的差异。结果尽管阿片类药物的入院率随着时间的推移稳步上升(25.9%至38.2%),但O/BZD的入院率在2017年之前一直呈上升趋势(3.2%至4.0%)。2017年,在组比较或O/BZD入院率范围内,没有因子达到中等效应大小(>=0.2)。在O/BZD和阿片类药物入院患者中,70%的患者自我报告海洛因。讨论和结论:与阿片类药物(包括仅含其他阿片类药物和合成药物的亚组)相比,O/BZD常规收集的数据在美国国家没有发现有意义的差异。在专业治疗中扩大现有阿片类药物治疗的努力可能有助于减少阿片类药物和O/BZD死亡。然而,该分析无法解决改变治疗是否会改善预后的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号