...
首页> 外文期刊>Developmental psychology >Age Differences in Emotion Regulation During Ongoing Affective Life: A Naturalistic Experience Sampling Study
【24h】

Age Differences in Emotion Regulation During Ongoing Affective Life: A Naturalistic Experience Sampling Study

机译:持续情感生活中情绪调节的年龄差:自然体验抽样研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A well-documented finding in aging and emotion research is that older adults reliably report less negative and, often, more positive affect than younger adults. How older people accomplish this is, however, an open question. We propose that this age effect is the result of differential use of emotion regulation strategies, especially when affective states call for them. We assessed a wide range of emotion regulation strategies over 2 months of daily life (60 consecutive days, N = 9,089 observations). Sample was composed of N = 153 participants (52% female; 62.09% White, 19.61% Black or African American, 9.80% Asian,1.96% Hispanic or Latino, 1.31% Native American, and 5.23% were missing cases) ranging in age from 18 to 84 years, (M = 45, SD = 20.02). We compare three age groups: young (n = 50, college students, median age of 21 years), middle aged (n = 52, university graduates, median age 44 years), and older (n = 51, university graduates, median age of 68 years). Using mixed model analyses of mood regulation strategy use, we find a main effect for age, negative affect (NA), and an interaction between NA and age, meaning that, in general, older participants' use of emotion regulation strategy was higher with negative affect than for younger participants. In summary, older participants used a wider variety of emotion regulation strategies, and they used them most when their affective states called for them, compared to younger participants. Results are interpreted along the lines of an "older but wiser" perspective on emotional well-being and aging.
机译:在老龄化和情绪研究中,一个有充分证据的发现是,老年人可靠地报告的负面影响比年轻人少,而且往往更积极。然而,老年人如何做到这一点是一个悬而未决的问题。我们认为,这种年龄效应是情绪调节策略不同使用的结果,尤其是当情绪状态需要时。我们在2个月的日常生活中(连续60天,N=9089次观察)评估了一系列情绪调节策略。样本由153名参与者组成(52%为女性,62.09%为白人,19.61%为黑人或非裔美国人,9.80%为亚裔,1.96%为拉美裔或拉丁裔,1.31%为美洲原住民,5.23%为缺失病例),年龄从18岁到84岁不等(M=45,SD=20.02)。我们比较了三个年龄组:年轻组(n=50,大学生,中位年龄21岁)、中年组(n=52,大学毕业生,中位年龄44岁)和老年组(n=51,大学毕业生,中位年龄68岁)。通过对情绪调节策略使用的混合模型分析,我们发现年龄、负性情绪(NA)以及NA和年龄之间的交互作用对情绪调节策略的使用有主要影响,这意味着,总体而言,年龄较大的参与者在负性情绪下使用情绪调节策略的比例高于年龄较小的参与者。总之,与年轻参与者相比,年龄较大的参与者使用的情绪调节策略种类更多,并且在情感状态需要时使用最多。研究结果是按照“更年长但更明智”的观点来解释情绪健康和衰老的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号