...
首页> 外文期刊>Dermatologic therapy >Are biologics combined with methotrexate better than biologics monotherapy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Are biologics combined with methotrexate better than biologics monotherapy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:生物学与甲氨蝶呤相结合,比生物学单疗在牛皮癣和银屑病性关节炎中更好:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To investigate if the combination of biologics with methotrexate (MTX) would have better performance than biological monotherapy in clinical efficiency and safety for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) searched from the Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses (including PASI 50, 75, and 90), and proportion of patients with Physician's Global Assessment Scale (sPGA) scored 0 or 1, were used for psoriasis assessment. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responder indices were used to assess the efficiency for treating PsA. The incidences of adverse events and antidrug antibodies' development were also recorded. A total of 15 studies with 4221 patients were included in this study. Three of the 15 RCTs were categorized as low risk of bias, nine studies as unclear, and three as high. Significant greater improvement in the combination group than monotherapy group for psoriasis was observed at week 12, week 24, and week 48, with no increased risk of severe adverse events and drug withdrawals due to adverse events. There was no significant difference in the comparison of clinical efficiency for the treatment of PsA at week 24. In conclusion, biologics plus MTX made better performance on improving the clinical efficiency for the treatment of psoriasis when compared with biologic monotherapy, without a difference in tolerability. However, this combination cannot improve the clinical efficiency of PsA treatment and more studies are warranted to elucidate relevant problems.
机译:为了研究生物制剂与甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合治疗银屑病和银屑病性关节炎(PsA)的临床疗效和安全性是否优于生物单一疗法,对从Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase检索的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾。银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)反应(包括PASI 50、75和90)以及医生全球评估量表(sPGA)得分为0或1的患者比例用于银屑病评估。美国风湿病学会(ACR)20/50/70应答者指数用于评估治疗PsA的效率。还记录了不良事件的发生率和抗药物抗体的发展。本研究共包括15项研究,共4221名患者。15项随机对照试验中有3项被归类为低偏倚风险,9项研究不明确,3项为高偏倚风险。在第12周、第24周和第48周,联合治疗组的银屑病改善程度明显高于单药治疗组,且未增加严重不良事件和因不良事件而停药的风险。在第24周,PsA治疗的临床疗效比较没有显著差异。综上所述,与生物单一疗法相比,生物制剂加MTX在提高银屑病的临床疗效方面表现更好,且耐受性无差异。然而,这种结合不能提高PsA治疗的临床效率,需要更多的研究来阐明相关问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号