...
首页> 外文期刊>Health and technology. >Dosimetry comparison and evaluation of 3D and IMRT for left breast cancer radiotherapy techniques treated at ain wazein medical village hospital in Lebanon
【24h】

Dosimetry comparison and evaluation of 3D and IMRT for left breast cancer radiotherapy techniques treated at ain wazein medical village hospital in Lebanon

机译:黎巴嫩AIN Wazein医用村医院AIN WAZE左乳腺癌放射治疗技术的3D和IMRT的剂量测定与评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy can be treated using the 3D conformal or VMAT techniques. For both plans, the doses received by the target and the organs at risk are determined and compared with protocols recommended for the safety of the patients. CT simulations of 10 women with left breast cancer were used for a 3D conformal and VMAT treatment plans in the radiotherapy department of Ain Wazein Medical Village Hospital (AWMV) utilizing Monaco Treatment Planning system using Collapsed-cone and Monte Carlo algorithms respectively. The total prescribed dose to the PTV was 50 Gy in 25 fractions each 2 Gy. The dosimetric parameters obtained were mean, D95%, and homogeneity index for PTV; mean dose and max doses for the heart; the V20% for the left and the right lungs. All values of this retrospective study were analysed and compared to the normal tissue maximum dose tolerance. VMAT plans resulted in significantly better coverage for the target volume concepts as compared with 3D-CRT (D95: 97% vs. 82%, p-value = 0.002; Dmean 4953 cGy in 3D-CRT vs. 5093 cGy in VMAT, p-value = 0.01). The left lung (V20:28.44% with 3D-CRT vs. 21.93 with VMAT, p-value = 0.02). For the heart (Dmax = 4919 cGy in 3D-CRT vs. 4617 cGy in VMAT, p-value = 0.07). For the right lung (V20 was 0.12% in 3D-CRT vs. 0.52% in VMAT with p-value = 0.008). Even though the p-value was significant for the 3D conformal technique, the dose for both techniques was very low and non-significant to have a risk in the organ. The VMAT technique with correct target volume delineation allowed a significant dose escalation and an increase in Tumor Control Probability (TCP). VMAT resulted in an improved sparing of OARs as compared with 3D-CRT at equivalent dose levels.
机译:接受放射治疗的乳腺癌患者可以使用3D适形或VMAT技术进行治疗。对于这两种方案,目标和风险器官接受的剂量都是确定的,并与为患者安全而推荐的方案进行比较。在Ain Wazein Medical Village医院(AWMV)的放射治疗部,对10名患有左乳腺癌的女性进行了CT模拟,分别使用了使用折叠锥和蒙特卡罗算法的摩纳哥治疗计划系统,进行了3D适形和VMAT治疗计划。PTV的总规定剂量为50 Gy,分为25组,每组2 Gy。获得的剂量学参数为PTV的平均值、D95%和均匀性指数;心脏的平均剂量和最大剂量;左肺和右肺的V20%。对该回顾性研究的所有值进行分析,并与正常组织的最大剂量耐受性进行比较。与3D-CRT相比,VMAT计划对目标体积概念的覆盖率显著提高(D95:97%对82%,p值=0.002;3D-CRT中的Dmean 4953 cGy对VMAT中的5093 cGy,p值=0.01)。左肺(3D-CRT组V20:28.44%,VMAT组V21.93,p值=0.02)。心脏(3D-CRT中Dmax=4919 cGy,VMAT中为4617 cGy,p值=0.07)。右肺(3D-CRT的V20为0.12%,VMAT为0.52%,p值=0.008)。尽管3D适形技术的p值非常显著,但这两种技术的剂量都非常低,对器官有风险也不显著。VMAT技术具有正确的靶体积描绘,允许显著的剂量增加和肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的增加。在同等剂量水平下,与3D-CRT相比,VMAT改善了OAR的节省。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号