...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Evidence-informed policymaking in practice: country-level examples of use of evidence for iCCM policy
【24h】

Evidence-informed policymaking in practice: country-level examples of use of evidence for iCCM policy

机译:实践中的证据明智的政策:国家层面的使用证据的例子,予以证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Integrated Community Case Management of Childhood Illness (iCCM) is a policy for providing treatment for malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia for children below 5 years at the community level, which is generating increasing evidence and support at the global level. As countries move to adopt iCCM, it becomes important to understand how this growing evidence base is viewed and used by national stakeholders. This article explores whether, how and why evidence influenced policy formulation for iCCM in Niger, Kenya and Mozambique, and uses Carol Weiss' models of research utilization to further explain the use of evidence in these contexts. A documentary review and in-depth stakeholder interviews were conducted as part of retrospective case studies in each study country. Findings indicate that all three countries used national monitoring data to identify the issue of children dying in the community prior to reaching health facilities, whereas international research evidence was used to identify policy options. Nevertheless, policymakers greatly valued local evidence and pilot projects proved critical in advancing iCCM. World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) functioned as knowledge brokers, bringing research evidence and experiences from other countries to the attention of local policymakers as well as sponsoring site visits and meetings. In terms of country-specific findings, Niger demonstrated both Interactive and Political models of research utilization by using iCCM to capitalize on the existing health infrastructure. Both Mozambique and Kenya exhibit Problem-Solving research utilization with different outcomes. Furthermore, the persistent quest for additional evidence suggests a Tactical use of research in Kenya. Results presented here indicate that while evidence from research studies and other contexts can be critical to policy development, local evidence is often needed to answer key policymaker questions. In the end, evidence may not be enough to overcome resistance if the policy is viewed as incompatible with national goals.
机译:儿童疾病综合社区病例管理(iCCM)是一项在社区一级为5岁以下儿童提供疟疾、腹泻和肺炎治疗的政策,正在全球一级产生越来越多的证据和支持。随着各国采取iCCM,了解国家利益相关者如何看待和使用这一不断增长的证据基础变得非常重要。本文探讨了证据是否、如何以及为什么会影响尼日尔、肯尼亚和莫桑比克iCCM的政策制定,并使用Carol Weiss的研究利用模型进一步解释了证据在这些背景下的使用。作为每个研究国家回顾性案例研究的一部分,进行了文献回顾和深入的利益相关者访谈。调查结果表明,这三个国家都使用国家监测数据来确定儿童在到达卫生设施之前在社区中死亡的问题,而国际研究证据则用于确定政策选择。然而,政策制定者非常重视地方证据,事实证明,试点项目对推进iCCM至关重要。世界卫生组织和联合国儿童基金会(儿童基金会)充当知识中介,将其他国家的研究证据和经验提请当地决策者注意,并赞助实地考察和会议。在针对具体国家的研究结果方面,尼日尔通过利用iCCM利用现有的卫生基础设施,展示了研究利用的互动和政治模式。莫桑比克和肯尼亚都表现出解决问题的研究利用率不同。此外,对额外证据的持续追求表明,在肯尼亚进行研究是一种策略。本文给出的结果表明,虽然来自研究和其他背景的证据对政策制定至关重要,但通常需要当地证据来回答关键的决策者问题。最后,如果该政策被视为与国家目标不符,那么证据可能不足以克服阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号