首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Power and pro-poor policies: the case of iCCM in Niger
【24h】

Power and pro-poor policies: the case of iCCM in Niger

机译:权力和亲差的政策:尼日尔ICCM的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Analyses of health policy in low- and middle-income countries frequently mention but rarely adequately explore power dynamics, whether or not the policy in question targets the poor. We present a case study in Niger of integrated community case management (iCCM), a policy to provide basic care for poor rural children sick with malaria, diarrhoea and pneumonia, which has contributed to measurable reductions in child mortality. We focus on the three dimensions of power in policymaking: political authority, financial resources and technical expertise. Data collection took place March to August 2012 and included semi-structured interviews with policy actors (N = 32), a document review (N = 103) and contextual analysis. Preliminary data analysis relied on process tracing methodology to examine why iCCM was prioritized and identify dimensions of power most relevant to the Nigerien case; we then applied theoretical categories deductively to our data. We find that political authorities, namely President Mamadou Tandja, created the underlying health infrastructure for the policy ('health huts') as a way to distribute rents from development aid through client networks while claiming the mantle of political legitimacy. Conditional influxes of financial resources created an incentive to declare fee exemptions for children below 5 years, a key condition for the policy's success. Technical expertise was concentrated among international actors from multi-lateral and bilateral agencies who packaged and delivered scientific arguments in support of iCCM to Nigerien policymakers, whose input was limited mainly to operational decisions. The Nigerien case sheds light on the dimensions of power in health policymaking, particularly in neo-patrimonial African regimes, and provides insights on how external actors can work within these contexts to promote pro-poor policies.
机译:对中低收入国家卫生政策的分析经常提到但很少充分探讨权力动态,无论该政策是否针对穷人。我们在尼日尔进行了一项综合社区病例管理(iCCM)的案例研究,该政策旨在为患有疟疾、腹泻和肺炎的贫困农村儿童提供基本护理,这有助于显著降低儿童死亡率。我们关注决策中权力的三个方面:政治权威、财政资源和技术专长。数据收集于2012年3月至8月进行,包括与政策参与者的半结构化访谈(N=32)、文件审查(N=103)和背景分析。初步数据分析依赖于过程追踪方法,以检查iCCM为何优先,并确定与尼日利亚案件最相关的权力维度;然后,我们将理论范畴演绎地应用到我们的数据中。我们发现,政治当局,即马马杜·坦贾总统,为该政策创建了基本的卫生基础设施(“卫生小屋”),作为通过客户网络分配发展援助租金的一种方式,同时声称拥有政治合法性。有条件的财政资源流入促使人们宣布对5岁以下儿童免收学费,这是该政策成功的关键条件。技术专业知识集中在来自多边和双边机构的国际行为者中,他们将支持iCCM的科学论据打包并提供给尼日利亚决策者,而决策者的投入主要限于业务决策。Nigerien案揭示了卫生政策制定中的权力层面,特别是在新世袭的非洲政权中,并提供了外部行为者如何在这些背景下推动扶贫政策的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号