首页> 外文期刊>Health care analysis: HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy >Scientism in Medical Education and the Improvement of Medical Care: Opioids, Competencies, and Social Accountability
【24h】

Scientism in Medical Education and the Improvement of Medical Care: Opioids, Competencies, and Social Accountability

机译:医学教育科学与医疗保健改善:阿片类药物,能力和社会责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scientism in medical education distracts educators from focusing on the content of learning; it focuses attention instead on individual achievement and validity in its measurement. I analyze the specific form that scientism takes in medicine and in medical education. The competencies movement attempts to challenge old “scientistic” views of the role of physicians, but in the end it has invited medical educators to focus on validity in the measurement of individual performance for attitudes and skills that medicine resists conceptualizing as objective. Academic medicine should focus its efforts instead on quality and relevance of care. The social accountability movement proposes to shift the focus of academic medicine to the goal of high quality and relevant care in the context of community service and partnership with the institutions that together with medicine create and cope with health and with health deficits. I make the case for this agenda through a discussion of the linked histories of the opioid prescribing crisis and the professionalism movement.
机译:医学教育中的科学主义分散了教育者对学习内容的关注;它将注意力集中在个人成就和测量的有效性上。分析了科学主义在医学和医学教育中的具体表现形式。胜任力运动试图挑战关于医生角色的旧的“科学主义”观点,但最终它邀请医学教育工作者关注测量个人态度和技能表现的有效性,而医学拒绝将其概念化为目标。学术医学应该把精力集中在护理的质量和相关性上。社会责任运动提议将学术医学的重点转移到社区服务和与医疗机构合作的高质量和相关护理的目标上,这些机构与医学一起创造并应对健康和健康缺陷。我通过讨论阿片类药物处方危机和职业化运动的相关历史来证明这一议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号