...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart failure reviews >Bias in natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure trials: time to improve guideline adherence using alternative approaches
【24h】

Bias in natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure trials: time to improve guideline adherence using alternative approaches

机译:利用肽引导的心力衰竭试验的偏见:使用替代方法改善指南遵守的时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with currently available therapies reduces morbidity and mortality. However, implementation of these therapies is a problem with only few patients achieving guideline-recommended maximal doses of therapy. In an effort to improve guideline adherence and uptitration, several trials have investigated a biomarker-guided strategy (using natriuretic peptide targets in specific), but although conceptually promising, these trials failed to show a consistent beneficial effect on outcomes. In this review, we discuss different methodological issues that may explain the failure of these trials and offer potential solutions. Moreover, alternative approaches to increase heart failure guideline adherence are evaluated.
机译:用现有疗法治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者可降低发病率和死亡率。然而,这些疗法的实施是一个问题,只有少数患者达到指南建议的最大治疗剂量。为了提高指南的依从性和有效性,有几项试验研究了一种生物标记物导向的策略(具体使用利钠肽靶点),但尽管从概念上讲很有希望,但这些试验未能显示出对结果的一致有益影响。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了可能解释这些试验失败的不同方法学问题,并提供了可能的解决方案。此外,还评估了增加心力衰竭指南依从性的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号