首页> 外文期刊>Health services & outcomes research methodology >Veridical causal inference using propensity score methods for comparative effectiveness research with medical claims
【24h】

Veridical causal inference using propensity score methods for comparative effectiveness research with medical claims

机译:使用医疗权利要求的比较有效性研究倾向评分方法进行验证因果推断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Medical insurance claims are becoming increasingly common data sources to answer a variety of questions in biomedical research. Although comprehensive in terms of longitudinal characterization of disease development and progression for a potentially large number of patients, population-based inference using these datasets require thoughtful modifications to sample selection and analytic strategies relative to other types of studies. Along with complex selection bias and missing data issues, claims-based studies are purely observational, which limits effective understanding and characterization of the treatment differences between groups being compared. All these issues contribute to a crisis in reproducibility and replication of comparative findings using medical claims. This paper offers practical guidance to the analytical process, demonstrates methods for estimating causal treatment effects with propensity score methods for several types of outcomes common to such studies, such as binary, count, time to event and longitudinally varying measures, and also aims to increase transparency and reproducibility of reporting of results from these investigations. We provide an online version of the paper with readily implementable code for the entire analysis pipeline to serve as a guided tutorial for practitioners. The online version can be accessed at https://rydaro.github.io/. The analytic pipeline is illustrated using a sub-cohort of patients with advanced prostate cancer from the large Clinformatics TM Data Mart Database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, Minnesota), consisting of 73 million distinct private payer insures from 2001 to 2016.
机译:医疗保险索赔正在成为回答生物医学研究中各种问题的越来越常见的数据来源。尽管就潜在的大量患者的疾病发展和进展的纵向特征而言是全面的,但使用这些数据集进行基于人群的推断需要对样本选择和分析策略进行深思熟虑的修改,以与其他类型的研究相比较。除了复杂的选择偏差和数据缺失问题,基于索赔的研究纯粹是观察性的,这限制了对被比较组之间治疗差异的有效理解和表征。所有这些问题都导致了使用医疗索赔的比较结果的再现性和复制性危机。本文为分析过程提供了实用指导,展示了使用倾向评分法对此类研究常见的几种结果类型(如二进制、计数、事件发生时间和纵向变化的测量)估计因果治疗效果的方法,还旨在提高这些调查结果报告的透明度和再现性。我们提供了本文的在线版本,其中包含整个分析管道的易于实现的代码,作为从业者的指导教程。在线版可在以下网址访问:https://rydaro.github.io/.使用大型Clinformatics TM数据集市数据库(明尼苏达州伊甸草原OptumInsight)中晚期前列腺癌患者的子队列对分析管道进行了说明,该数据库包括2001年至2016年7300万不同的私人付款人保险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号