...
首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Surgery: Official Journal of the Societe Internationale de Chirurgie, Collegium Internationale Chirurgiae Digestivae, and of the International Association of Endocrine Surgeons >Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-Based Prospective Hospital Payment System can be well adopted for Acute Care Surgery: Taiwanese Experience with Acute Cholecystitis
【24h】

Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG)-Based Prospective Hospital Payment System can be well adopted for Acute Care Surgery: Taiwanese Experience with Acute Cholecystitis

机译:与诊断相关的组(DRG)基于急性护理手术的潜在医院支付系统:台湾人急性胆囊炎的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common procedure for cholelithiasis paid by diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) systems. However, acute cholecystitis (AC) patients usually have heterogeneous conditions that compromise the successful implementation of DRGs. We evaluated the quality/efficiency of treating AC patients under the DRG system in Taiwan. Methods All AC patients who underwent LC between October 2015 and December 2016 were included. Patient demographics, treatment outcomes, and financial results were analyzed. Patients were reimbursed by one of the two DRG schemes based on their comorbidities/complications (CC): DRG-1, LC without CC; and DRG-2, LC with CC. Hospitals were reimbursed the costs incurred if they were below the lower threshold (balanced sector); with the outlier threshold if costs were between the lower and outlier thresholds (profitable sector); and with the outlier threshold plus 80% of the exceeding cost if costs were higher than the outlier threshold (profit-losing sector). Results Among 246 patients, 114 were paid by DRG-1, and 132 were by DRG-2. In total, 195 of 246 patients underwent LC within 1 day after admission, and patients with mild AC had shorter hospital stays than those with moderate or severe AC. The complication rate was 7.3% with only one mortality. In total, 92.1% of patients in DRG-1 and 90.9% of patients in DRG-2 were profitable. The average margin per patient was 11,032 TWD for DRG-1 and 24,993 TWD for DRG-2. Conclusions DRGs can be well adopted for acute care surgery, and hospitals can still provide satisfactory services without losing profit.
机译:背景腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是一种常见的胆石症治疗方法,由诊断相关小组(DRG)支付费用。然而,急性胆囊炎(AC)患者通常有各种各样的情况,影响DRG的成功实施。我们评估了台湾在DRG系统下治疗AC患者的质量/效率。方法纳入2015年10月至2016年12月期间接受LC治疗的所有AC患者。分析患者人口统计、治疗结果和财务结果。根据患者的共病/并发症(CC),患者通过两个DRG方案中的一个进行报销:DRG-1,无CC的LC;以及DRG-2,LC和CC。如果医院的费用低于下限(平衡部门),医院将获得补偿;如果成本介于下限和异常阈值(盈利部门)之间,则使用异常阈值;如果成本高于离群值阈值(亏损部门),则离群值阈值加上超过成本的80%。结果246例患者中,114例由DRG-1支付,132例由DRG-2支付。246例患者中有195例在入院后1天内接受了LC,轻度AC患者的住院时间比中度或重度AC患者短。并发症发生率为7.3%,仅有一例死亡。总的来说,92.1%的DRG-1患者和90.9%的DRG-2患者是盈利的。DRG-1和DRG-2患者的平均边缘分别为11032 TWD和24993 TWD。结论DRGs可以很好地应用于急诊外科,医院仍能在不亏损的情况下提供满意的服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号