首页> 外文期刊>The Naturalist >Thirty years of garden wildlife. Inspired by Jennifer Owen
【24h】

Thirty years of garden wildlife. Inspired by Jennifer Owen

机译:三十年的花园野生动物。 灵感来自詹妮弗欧文

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The long-held and indeed, traditional view that the British population earned its money in the towns and went to the countryside for its recreation and wildlife was a casualty of the Second World War when the Ministry of Agriculture, which had spent the 1920s and 30s proselytising intensive farming with almost no success (Bowers, 1998) got the ability to subsidise farmers. The range of grants for 'farm improvements' introduced by the 1947 Agriculture Act rapidly transformed the landscape (Bowers, 1985). It also devastated British wildlife. Concerns were already being expressed in the 1960s (Cheshire & Bowers, 1969). In 1977 in a definitive study of the destruction of farmland habitats, the NCC (Nature Conservancy Council, 1977) contrasted the typical unimproved farm with 20 species of mammals, 37 species of birds and 17 species of butterflies with the typical improved farm with, respectively, 5 mammals, 6 bird species and no butterflies. Losses of farm wildlife continue to the present day and can now be tracked through published official statistics (DEFRA, 2015).
机译:长期以来,英国人在城镇挣钱,到农村去娱乐和野生动物的传统观点是第二次世界大战的牺牲品,当时农业部在20世纪20年代和30年代对集约农业进行了宣传,但几乎没有成功(Bowers,1998年),获得了补贴农民的能力。1947年《农业法》引入的“农场改良”拨款范围迅速改变了景观(Bowers,1985)。它还摧毁了英国的野生动物。20世纪60年代,人们已经表达了担忧(柴郡和鲍尔斯,1969年)。1977年,在一项关于农田栖息地破坏的权威性研究中,NCC(自然保护委员会,1977年)将20种哺乳动物、37种鸟类和17种蝴蝶的典型未改良农场与5种哺乳动物、6种鸟类和无蝴蝶的典型改良农场进行了对比。农场野生动物的损失一直持续到今天,现在可以通过公布的官方统计数据进行追踪(DEFRA,2015)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号