...
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of pharmacy practice >Issues with deprescribing in haemodialysis: a qualitative study of patient and provider experiences
【24h】

Issues with deprescribing in haemodialysis: a qualitative study of patient and provider experiences

机译:血液透析贬损的问题:患者和提供者体验的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Rationale, aims and objectives Patients undergoing haemodialysis receive on average 10-17 medications, which increase the risk of falls, adverse drug reactions and hospitalizations. Supervised discontinuation of potentially inappropriate medications may lower these risks. Although many calls have been made for deprescribing in the haemodialysis setting, little is known about how patients and providers in this setting experience it. The aim of this study is to explore patient and provider experiences and perceptions of one of the rare deprescribing intervention in haemodialysis. Methods Ten semi-structured interviews were held with patients, and a focus group was done with dialysis clinic team members at a Montreal area health network's haemodialysis clinic after the implementation of a standardized deprescribing intervention using the patient-as-partner approach. The interviews and focus group were recorded, and verbatims were coded to determine emerging themes. Grounded theory was used for interview guide design and data analysis. Results The three emerging themes were (1) ambivalence towards medication creating a favourable context for deprescribing, (2) the empowering elements of the deprescribing process and (3) the uncertain future of deprescribing in the clinics even though the intervention was considered successful. Conclusion Haemodialysis patients and providers viewed deprescribing favourably, believed the intervention was valuable, and offered suggestions for long term implementation while expressing concerns about feasibility. Notwithstanding the underlying uncertainties, a structured and integrated approach in routine practice involving all members of the care team may facilitate the continuity of deprescribing as an intervention in the setting of a haemodialysis clinic.
机译:理由、目的和目标接受血液透析的患者平均接受10-17种药物,这会增加跌倒、药物不良反应和住院的风险。在监督下停用可能不合适的药物可能会降低这些风险。尽管有很多人呼吁在血液透析环境中进行减容,但很少有人知道患者和提供者在这种环境下是如何经历的。这项研究的目的是探索患者和提供者对血液透析中罕见的一种预防性干预的经验和看法。方法对患者进行10次半结构式访谈,并在蒙特利尔地区卫生网络的血液透析诊所实施以患者为合作伙伴的标准化预防干预后,与透析诊所团队成员进行焦点小组讨论。对访谈和焦点小组进行记录,并对逐字记录进行编码,以确定新出现的主题。访谈指南的设计和数据分析采用扎根理论。结果三个新出现的主题是:(1)对药物的矛盾心理,为药物治疗创造了有利的环境;(2)药物治疗过程中的授权因素;(3)尽管干预被认为是成功的,但临床上药物治疗的未来仍不确定。结论血液透析患者和提供者对减容持肯定态度,认为干预措施有价值,并对长期实施提出建议,同时对可行性表示担忧。尽管存在潜在的不确定性,但在日常实践中,涉及护理团队所有成员的结构化和综合方法可能有助于作为血液透析诊所设置干预措施的持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号