首页> 外文期刊>Traffic Injury Prevention >Evaluation of interventions to make top tether hardware more visible during child restraint system (CRS) installations
【24h】

Evaluation of interventions to make top tether hardware more visible during child restraint system (CRS) installations

机译:在儿童约束系统(CRS)安装期间,评估干预措施使最顶级系绳硬件更加可见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: The objective of the study is to determine whether specific child restraint system (CRS) or vehicle conditions improve top tether attachment rates during volunteer installations.Methods: A factorial randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate 4 different experimental categories: (1) Color of tether adjuster casing (black or red), (2) labeling on tether adjuster casing (labeled with Tether: Use for forward-facing or unlabeled), (3) storage location of tether (bundled in a rubber band on the back of CRS or Velcroed over the forward-facing belt path), and (4) labeling in vehicle (labeled under head restraint and below anchor or unlabeled). Ninety-six volunteers were randomly assigned to one combination of conditions. One installation per volunteer was completed. The primary outcome measure was acceptable attachment of the top tether to the tether anchor. The secondary outcome measure was overall secureness of the installation. Pearson's chi-square tests were used to identify significant predictors of acceptable outcomes and logistic regression was used to investigate interaction effects.Results: A total of 66/96 subjects (68.8%) attached the top tether in an acceptable manner, with either zero errors (n=50) or minor errors (n=16). A total of 30/96 subjects (31.2%) had unacceptable tether outcomes, with either major errors (n=10) or nonuse the tether at all (n=20). None of the 4 experimental categories significantly affected tether outcomes. Subjects who opted to install the CRS with the lower anchors (LAs) had higher rates of acceptable tether attachment compared to subjects who installed using the seat belt or those who used both LA and seat belt together (chi(2) = 6.792, P = .034). Tether outcomes were not correlated with previous CRS experience, use of instruction manual(s), age, or sex. Only 15.6% of subjects produced overall correct and tight installations. Of those who used the seat belt in some manner, 70.2% neglected to switch the retractor into locking mode.Conclusions: Conditions in this study including tether color, tether labeling, storage location, and vehicle labeling did not significantly affect tether attachment rates. High rates of tether misuse and nonuse warrant further exploration to find effective solutions to this usability problem.
机译:目标:本研究的目的是确定特定儿童约束系统(CRS)或车辆状况是否会提高志愿者安装期间的顶部系带连接率。方法:设计一项析因随机对照试验,评估4种不同的实验类别:(1)栓带调节器外壳的颜色(黑色或红色),(2)栓带调节器外壳上的标签(标记有栓带:用于前向或未标记),(3)栓带的存储位置(捆绑在CRS背面的橡皮筋中或在前向皮带路径上的尼龙搭扣中),和(4)车内标签(在头枕下和锚下贴标签或未贴标签)。96名志愿者被随机分配到一个条件组合中。每个志愿者完成一次安装。主要结果测量是可接受的顶部系带与系带锚的连接。第二个结果是装置的整体安全性。Pearson的卡方检验用于确定可接受结果的显著预测因子,logistic回归用于调查交互效应。结果:共有66/96名受试者(68.8%)以可接受的方式连接上系带,无错误(n=50)或轻微错误(n=16)。共有30/96受试者(31.2%)出现不可接受的系带结果,出现严重错误(n=10)或根本不使用系带(n=20)。4种实验类别均未显著影响栓系结果。与使用安全带安装的受试者或同时使用LA和安全带安装的受试者相比,选择使用下锚(LAs)安装CRS的受试者有更高的可接受系带连接率(chi(2)=6.792,P=0.034)。系带结果与之前的CRS经验、使用说明书、年龄或性别无关。只有15.6%的受试者完成了整体正确且紧凑的安装。在以某种方式使用安全带的人中,70.2%的人忽略了将卷收器切换到锁定模式。结论:本研究中的条件,包括栓带颜色、栓带标记、储存位置和载体标记,对栓带附着率没有显著影响。系绳误用和不使用的高比率需要进一步探索,以找到有效解决这一可用性问题的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号