首页> 外文期刊>The New Microbiologica >Comparison of the T-cell response to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) as detected by cytokine flow cytometry and QuantiFERON-CMV assay in HCMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients
【24h】

Comparison of the T-cell response to human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) as detected by cytokine flow cytometry and QuantiFERON-CMV assay in HCMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients

机译:通过细胞因子流式细胞术检测到HCMV血清阳性肾移植受者中的肝细胞瘤病毒(HCMV)对人巨细胞病毒(HCMV)的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-cell response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) helps to identify patients at risk for severe infection. To assess the T-cell response, this study compared our in-house developed reference test, based on T cell (both CD4+ and CD8+) stimulation by autologous HCMV-infected dendritic cells (iDC) and subsequent detection by cytokine flow cytometry (CFC-iDC), with the QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay. Fifty-three HCMV-seropositive KTR were enrolled. At the DNAemia peak, 33 (62%) had low viral load (LVL, 3x10(5) DNA copies/mL) self-resolving infection, 19 (36%) high viral load (HVL, 3x10(5) DNA copies/mL) infection treated with antivirals, and one LVL patient (2%) tissue-invasive disease alone. Both assays showed a delayed recovery of HCMV-specific T-cell immunity in HVL vs LVL patients. Immune reconstitution kinetics did not significantly differ between the two assays in HVL patients. QF-CMV and CFC-iDC showed comparable sensitivities, but QF-CMV had a lower (although not significantly) specificity. Indeed, 7/19 HVL patients (37%) were erroneously considered protected from severe infection by QF-CMV, whereas CFC-iDC misidentified only 3/19 (16%) patients as protected. Although our reference test takes longer to complete, it appears slightly better at predicting patients at risk for severe HCMV infection. Moreover, QF-CMV may provide false negative results with some HLA types.
机译:肾移植受者(KTR)中的人类巨细胞病毒(HCMV)特异性T细胞反应有助于识别有严重感染风险的患者。为了评估T细胞反应,本研究将我们内部开发的参考试验与QuantiFERON CMV(QF-CMV)分析进行了比较,该试验基于自体HCMV感染的树突状细胞(iDC)刺激T细胞(CD4+和CD8+)以及随后通过细胞因子流式细胞术(CFC-iDC)检测。53例HCMV血清阳性KTR患者入选。在DNA血症高峰时,33例(62%)患者存在低病毒载量(LVL,;3x10(5)DNA拷贝数/mL)的自分解感染,19例(36%)存在高病毒载量(HVL,;3x10(5)DNA拷贝数/mL)的抗病毒治疗感染,1例LVL患者(2%)仅存在组织浸润性疾病。两项检测均显示HVL和LVL患者HCMV特异性T细胞免疫恢复延迟。在HVL患者中,两种检测方法的免疫重建动力学没有显著差异。QF-CMV和CFC-iDC显示出相似的敏感性,但QF-CMV的特异性较低(尽管不显著)。事实上,19例HVL患者中有7例(37%)被错误地认为不受QF-CMV的严重感染,而CFC iDC错误地将19例患者中只有3例(16%)确定为受保护。虽然我们的参考测试需要更长的时间才能完成,但它在预测患者有严重HCMV感染风险方面似乎稍好一些。此外,QF-CMV可能提供某些HLA类型的假阴性结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号