首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >ECMO in trauma: What are the outcomes?
【24h】

ECMO in trauma: What are the outcomes?

机译:创伤中的Ecmo:什么是结果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We read with interest the case series and systematic review of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for ARDS in trauma by Robba et al. They report that of 31 trauma patients who required ECMO (27 from systematic literature review and 4 in their institutional case series) only 4 died, with a survival rate of 87.1%. This survival rate was noted to be high compared to other published institutional, national and international ECMO reports. The use of ECMO in the trauma population has been reported to have a survival benefit in patients with severe refractory hypoxic respiratory failure. Critical appraisal of available evidence is important in assessing high-cost critical care therapies. But this current review includes only selected case reports and series based on a desire to focus on anticoagulation management in this population. We believe this introduced a significant positive outcome bias in the results since most case reports are used by authors to report interventions that result in favorable outcomes. Consequently, the authors present a serious misrepresentation of the ECMO survival rate which is a significant limitation of this review.
机译:我们感兴趣地体外阅读了体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)在RoBBA等创伤中的ARDS病例系列和系统回顾,他们报告了31例需要ECMO的创伤患者(27例来自系统文献回顾,4例在其机构病例系列)中,仅4例死亡,存活率为87.1%。与其他已发表的机构、国家和国际ECMO报告相比,该存活率较高。据报道,在创伤人群中使用ECMO对严重难治性缺氧呼吸衰竭患者的生存有好处。对现有证据的批判性评估对于评估高成本的重症监护治疗非常重要。但目前的综述仅包括选定的病例报告和系列,其目的是关注该人群的抗凝治疗。我们认为,这在结果中引入了一个显著的积极结果偏差,因为大多数病例报告被作者用来报告导致有利结果的干预措施。因此,作者对ECMO存活率提出了严重的错误陈述,这是本综述的一个重大限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号