...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research >Methods of pain control during endometrial biopsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Methods of pain control during endometrial biopsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

机译:子宫内膜活检期间疼痛控制方法:随机对照试验的系统回顾与荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Abstract Aim To review effectiveness of methods for reducing pain during endometrial biopsy. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that examined effectiveness of pain control methods for endometrial biopsy. Risk of bias was assessed from sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting. Heterogeneity was examined from forest plot, statistical tests of homogeneity, and I 2 statistic. For meta‐analysis of pain scores, weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated. Results Twenty‐six studies were included in the review. Marginally significant reduction in the pain score during the procedure in participants with intrauterine lidocaine relative to control was observed (mean difference [MD] ?1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] ?2.70 to 0.09, P =?0.07). Subgroup analysis showed that in studies that used low‐pressure suction devices, intrauterine lidocaine was associated with statistically significant reduction in pain during the procedure (MD ?2.22, 95% CI ?3.72 to ?0.73, P =?0.004). There was a significantly lower pain score during biopsy in the anesthetic spray group compared to control (MD ?0.96, 95% CI ?1.53 to ?0.39, P =?0.001). Significant heterogeneity on types of intervention and outcome measures among studies that examined paracervical block and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAID) was observed. However, paracervical block and NSAID were associated with significant pain reduction compared to placebo in most of the related studies. Conclusion Intrauterine anesthetics, anesthetic cervical spray, paracervical block and oral NSAID provide effective pain control during endometrial biopsy.
机译:摘要目的探讨减轻子宫内膜活检疼痛的方法的有效性。方法PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane中心对照试验和临床试验记录。在gov数据库中搜索随机对照试验,检查子宫内膜活检疼痛控制方法的有效性。从序列生成、分配隐藏、盲法、不完整的结果数据和选择性结果报告中评估偏倚风险。从林分、同质性统计检验和I 2统计检验异质性。对于疼痛评分的荟萃分析,估计了95%置信区间(CI)的加权平均差。结果纳入26项研究。与对照组相比,使用宫内利多卡因的受试者在手术过程中的疼痛评分略微显著降低(平均差异[MD]?1.31,95%可信区间[CI]?2.70至0.09,P=0.07)。亚组分析显示,在使用低压吸引装置的研究中,宫内利多卡因与术中疼痛的统计学显著减轻相关(MD?2.22,95%可信区间?3.72至?0.73,P=0.004)。与对照组相比,麻醉喷雾剂组活检过程中的疼痛评分显著降低(MD?0.96,95%可信区间?1.53至?0.39,P=0.001)。在检查宫颈旁阻滞和非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的研究中,观察到干预类型和结果测量的显著异质性。然而,在大多数相关研究中,与安慰剂相比,颈旁阻滞和非甾体抗炎药与显著减轻疼痛相关。结论子宫内膜活检术中使用宫内麻醉剂、麻醉宫颈喷雾剂、颈旁阻滞和口服非甾体抗炎药可有效控制疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号