...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Is Outpatient Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Safe to Perform at an Ambulatory Surgery Center? A Comparative Study of Early Post-Operative Complications
【24h】

Is Outpatient Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Safe to Perform at an Ambulatory Surgery Center? A Comparative Study of Early Post-Operative Complications

机译:门诊室膝关节关节术安全,在动态手术中心进行吗? 术后并发症早期术后并发症的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) lends itself to the outpatient surgical setting. Prior literature has established a low rate of readmission and post-operative complications when performed in a hospital outpatient setting (HOP). To our knowledge, there have been no studies comparing complications of UKA performed at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and those in a HOP. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent outpatient UKA by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2016. In all 569 outpatient UKAs were performed: 288 in the ASC group and 281 in the HOP group. We compared the groups with regard to all complications within the first 90 days after surgery. ResultsThirty minor and major complications occurred within 90 days (5.3%). There was no difference in the overall complication rate between groups (ASC 12, 4.2%; HOP 18, 6.4%) (P?= .26). Day of surgery admission occurred once in the HOP group (0.4%) and did not occur in the ASC group (P?= .49). There was 1 visit to the emergency department (ED) <24?hours from surgery in each group (ASC 0.3%, HOP 0.4%) (P?= 1.0). ED visits occurred within 7 days in 3 ASC cases (1.0%) and 4 HOP cases (1.4%) (P?= .72). Re-admissions in the first 90 days occurred in 5 ASC cases (1.7%) and 8 HOP cases (2.8%) (P?= .41). ConclusionUKA at an ASC has a low early postoperative complication rate without increased risk of re-admission or ED evaluation when compared to UKAs performed at a HOP.
机译:背景单室膝关节置换术(UKA)适合门诊手术环境。之前的文献已经证实,在医院门诊环境(HOP)中进行再入院和术后并发症的发生率较低。据我们所知,还没有研究比较在非卧床手术中心(ASC)和HOP中进行的UKA并发症。方法回顾性分析2012年至2016年间由一名外科医生进行UKA门诊治疗的所有患者。在所有569例门诊患者中,进行了UKAs:ASC组288例,HOP组281例。我们比较了两组在术后90天内的所有并发症。结果90天内发生大小并发症30例(5.3%)。两组之间的总体并发症发生率没有差异(ASC 12,4.2%;HOP 18,6.4%)(P?=0.26)。HOP组(0.4%)有一次手术入院,ASC组没有手术入院(P?=0.49)。有一次去急诊室(ED)<24?各组手术时间(ASC 0.3%,HOP 0.4%)(P?=1.0)。3例ASC患者(1.0%)和4例HOP患者(1.4%)的急诊就诊发生在7天内(P?=0.72)。前90天再次入院的ASC患者有5例(1.7%),HOP患者有8例(2.8%)(P=0.41)。结论ASC中的UKA术后早期并发症发生率较低,与HOP中的UKA术相比,不会增加再次入院或ED评估的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号