首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >Does Intermittent Catheterization Compared to Indwelling Catheterization Decrease the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?
【24h】

Does Intermittent Catheterization Compared to Indwelling Catheterization Decrease the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

机译:与留置导尿管相比间歇性导管表达是否降低了总膝关节置换术后患有百血性关节感染的风险?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Catheterization for the prophylaxis against or treatment for urinary retention commonly occurs after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Recent studies have questioned the use of the indwelling catheterization, especially in its potential role as a nidus for infection. We are still unsure of its down-stream effects on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the risks of postoperative PJI following intermittent vs indwelling catheterization after TKA.
机译:背景:预防或治疗尿潴留的导尿通常发生在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后。最近的研究质疑了留置导管插入术的使用,尤其是其作为感染病灶的潜在作用。我们仍不确定其对假体周围关节感染(PJI)的下游影响。因此,本研究旨在比较TKA术后间歇性导管插入术与留置导管插入术后发生PJI的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号