...
首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of health economics: HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care >Cost-effectiveness of biennial screening for diabetes related retinopathy in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared to annual screening
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of biennial screening for diabetes related retinopathy in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes compared to annual screening

机译:与年度筛查相比,1型和2型糖尿病患者对糖尿病相关视网膜病变的两年期筛查的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective Examine the health and economic impact of extending screening intervals in people with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) without diabetes-related retinopathy (DR). Setting Diabetic Eye Screening Wales (DESW). Study design Retrospective observational study with cost-utility analysis (CUA) and Decremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (DCER) study. Intervention Biennial screening versus usual care (annual screening). Inputs Anonymised data from DESW were linked to primary care data for people with two prior screening events with no DR. Transition probabilities for progression to DR were estimated based on a subset of 26,812 and 1232 people with T2DM and T1DM, respectively. DCER above 20,000 pound per QALY was considered cost-effective. Results The base case analysis DCER results of 71,243 pound and 23,446 pound per QALY for T2DM and T1DM respectively at a 3.5% discount rate and 56,822 pound and 14,221 pound respectively when discounted at 1.5%. Diabetes management represented by the mean HbA(1c) was 7.5% for those with T2DM and 8.7% for T1DM. Sensitivity analysis Extending screening to biennial based on HbA(1c), being the strongest predictor of progression of DR, at three levels of HbA(1c) 6.5%, 8.0% and 9.5% lost one QALY saving the NHS 106,075; pound 58,653 pound and 31,626 pound respectively for T2DM and 94,696 pound, 37,646 pound and 11,089 pound respectively for T1DM. In addition, extending screening to biennial based on the duration of diabetes > 6 years for T2DM per QALY lost, saving the NHS 54,106 pound and for 6-12 and > 12 years for T1DM saving 83,856 pound, 23,446 pound and 13,340 pound respectively. Conclusions Base case and sensitivity analyses indicate biennial screening to be cost-effective for T2DM irrespective of HbA(1c) and duration of diabetes. However, the uncertainty around the DCER indicates that annual screening should be maintained for those with T1DM especially when the HbA(1c) exceeds 80 mmol/mol (9.5%) and duration of diabetes is greater than 12 years.
机译:目的探讨在无糖尿病相关视网膜病变(DR)的2型糖尿病(T2DM)和1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者中延长筛查间隔对健康和经济的影响。设置威尔士糖尿病眼筛查(DESW)。研究设计采用成本效用分析(CUA)和递减成本效益比(DCER)研究进行回顾性观察研究。干预两年期筛查与常规护理(年度筛查)。来自DESW的输入匿名数据与之前有两次筛查事件且没有DR的人的初级保健数据相关联。分别基于26812和1232名T2DM和T1DM患者的子集估计进展为DR的转移概率。每QALY超过20000磅的DCER被认为具有成本效益。结果以3.5%的贴现率计算,2型糖尿病和1型糖尿病的基础病例分析DCER结果分别为每QALY 71243磅和23446磅,贴现率为1.5%时分别为56822磅和14221磅。以平均糖化血红蛋白(1c)为代表的糖尿病管理在2型糖尿病患者中为7.5%,在1型糖尿病患者中为8.7%。敏感性分析将基于HbA1c的筛查扩展到两年一次,HbA1c是DR进展的最强预测因子,在HbA1c的三个水平上,6.5%、8.0%和9.5%失去了一个QALY,挽救了NHS 106075;T2DM分别为58653磅和31626磅,T1DM分别为94696磅、37646磅和11089磅。此外,根据每QALY损失的T2DM患者的糖尿病持续时间>6年,将筛查延长至两年一次,从而为NHS节省54106磅,为6-12年和>12年的T1DM患者分别节省83856磅、23446磅和13340磅。结论基本病例和敏感性分析表明,无论糖化血红蛋白(1c)和糖尿病持续时间如何,两年一次的T2DM筛查都具有成本效益。然而,DCER的不确定性表明,对于T1DM患者,尤其是当HbA1c超过80 mmol/mol(9.5%)且糖尿病持续时间超过12年时,应保持年度筛查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号