首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of hospice & palliative medicine >Specialist Palliative Care Activity at an Acute Care Tertiary Hospital and Its Representation in Administrative Data
【24h】

Specialist Palliative Care Activity at an Acute Care Tertiary Hospital and Its Representation in Administrative Data

机译:急性护理高等医院的专业姑息治疗活动及其在行政数据中的代表

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To quantify and examine specialist palliative care (SPC) in-hospital activity and compare it to routinely collected administrative data on palliative care (PC). Methods: All patients discharged from a large acute care tertiary hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between July 1 and December 31, 2017, were identified from the hospital’s data warehouse. Administrative data were supplemented with information from the electronic medical record for hospital stays which were assigned the PC additional diagnosis code (Z51.5); had a “palliative care” care type; or included SPC consultation. Results: Of 34 653 hospital stays, 524 were coded as receiving PC—based on care type (43%) and/or diagnosis code Z51.5 (100%). Specialist palliative care provided 1717 consultations over 507 hospital stays. Patients had 2 (median; interquartile range: 1-4) consultations during an average stay of 15.3 days (SD 15.78; median 10); the first occurred 7.0 days (SD 12.13; median 3) after admission. Of patient stays with an SPC consultation, 70% were assigned the PC Z51.5 code; 60% were referred for symptom management; 68% had cancer. One hundred forty-one patients were under a palliative specialist—either from initial hospital admission (49.6%) or later in their stay. Conclusions: Palliative care specialists provide expert input into patient management, benefitting patients and other clinicians. Administrative data inadequately capture their involvement in patient care, especially consultations, and are therefore inappropriate for reporting SPC activity. Exclusion of information related to SPC activity results in an incomplete and distorted representation of PC services and fails to acknowledge the valuable contribution made by SPC.
机译:目的:量化和检查专科姑息治疗(SPC)的院内活动,并将其与常规收集的姑息治疗(PC)管理数据进行比较。方法:2017年7月1日至12月31日期间,从澳大利亚新南威尔士州一家大型三级急诊医院出院的所有患者均来自该医院的数据仓库。行政数据补充了住院电子病历中的信息,该病历被分配了PC附加诊断代码(Z51.5);有“姑息治疗”类型的护理;或者包括SPC咨询。结果:在34653例住院患者中,524例根据护理类型(43%)和/或诊断代码Z51被编码为接受PC。5 (100%). 专科姑息治疗在507次住院期间提供了1717次咨询。患者在平均15.3天的住院期间进行了2次(中位数;四分位数范围:1-4)咨询(标准差15.78;中位数10);第一次出现在入院后7.0天(标准差12.13;中位数3)。在接受SPC会诊的患者中,70%被分配到PC Z51。5代码;60%被转诊进行症状管理;68%患有癌症。141名患者从首次入院(49.6%)或住院后接受姑息治疗专家治疗。结论:姑息治疗专家为患者管理提供专家意见,使患者和其他临床医生受益。管理数据没有充分反映他们参与患者护理,尤其是会诊的情况,因此不适合报告SPC活动。排除与SPC活动相关的信息会导致PC服务的表述不完整和扭曲,并未能确认SPC所做的宝贵贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号