首页> 外文期刊>Psychosomatic Medicine: Journal of the American Psychosomatic Society >Dispositional Mindfulness and Acute Heat Pain: Comparing Stimulus-Evoked Pain With Summary Pain Assessment
【24h】

Dispositional Mindfulness and Acute Heat Pain: Comparing Stimulus-Evoked Pain With Summary Pain Assessment

机译:令人厌恶的思想和急性热疼痛:将刺激诱发的疼痛与摘要疼痛评估进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Dispositional mindfulness is associated with reduced pain in clinical and experimental settings. However, researchers have neglected the type of pain assessment, as dispositional mindfulness may have unique benefits for reduced pain sensitivity when relying on summary pain assessments, in contrast to assessing the pain of each noxious stimulus. Here, we test the association between dispositional mindfulness and pain using both trial-by-trial pain assessments and overall summary ratings after acute pain tasks. Methods One hundred thirty-one healthy adult volunteers (mean age = 29.09 [8.00] years, 55.7% female) underwent two experimental thermal pain paradigms. We tested whether dispositional mindfulness measured with the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale was related to a) heat-evoked pain sensitivity, as measured by pain threshold, pain tolerance, average pain, trial-by-trial ratings, and heat-evoked skin conductance response, and b) summary judgments of sensory and affective pain assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Results Mindful Attention Awareness Scale ratings were associated with decreased pain on the MPQ sensory (B = -0.18, SE = 0.05, 95% confidence interval = -0.29 to -0.07, t = -3.28, p = .001) and affective (B = -0.11, SE = 0.03, 95% confidence interval = -0.18 to -0.05, t = -3.32, p = .001) dimensions but not with experimental thermal pain assessments, including threshold, tolerance, heat-evoked pain, or skin conductance response (p values >= .29). Conclusions In this study, dispositional mindfulness mitigated acute thermal pain only when pain was assessed using the MPQ. These findings may reflect differences in immediate versus retrospective judgments or the type of pain assessed by each measure. Future research should examine regulation processes that may explain these differential analgesic benefits, such as attention, rumination, or reappraisal.
机译:目的在临床和实验环境中,倾向性正念与减轻疼痛有关。然而,研究人员忽视了疼痛评估的类型,因为与评估每种有害刺激的疼痛相比,当依赖于总结性疼痛评估时,倾向性正念可能对降低疼痛敏感性有独特的好处。在这里,我们使用逐个试验的疼痛评估和急性疼痛任务后的总体总结评分来测试倾向性正念与疼痛之间的关联。方法131名健康成年志愿者(平均年龄29.09[8.00]岁,55.7%为女性)接受两种实验性热痛范式。我们测试了用正念注意意识量表测量的倾向性正念是否与a)通过痛阈、疼痛耐受性、平均疼痛、逐次试验评级和热诱发皮肤电导反应测量的热诱发疼痛敏感性相关,以及b)使用麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)评估的感觉和情感疼痛的总结判断相关。结果正念注意意识量表评分与MPQ感官(B=-0.18,SE=0.05,95%置信区间=-0.29至-0.07,t=-3.28,p=.001)和情感(B=-0.11,SE=0.03,95%置信区间=-0.18至-0.05,t=-3.32,p=.001)维度的疼痛降低有关,但与实验性热痛评估(包括阈值、耐受性、,热诱发疼痛或皮肤电导反应(p值>=.29)。结论在本研究中,只有在使用MPQ评估疼痛时,倾向性正念才能减轻急性热痛。这些发现可能反映了即时判断与回顾性判断的差异,或反映了每种测量评估的疼痛类型。未来的研究应该检查可能解释这些差异止痛益处的调节过程,如注意力、反刍或重新评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号