首页> 外文期刊>Prostate cancer >The Association of the Long Prostate Cancer Expressed PDE4D Transcripts to Poor Patient Outcome Depends on the Tumour's TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion Status
【24h】

The Association of the Long Prostate Cancer Expressed PDE4D Transcripts to Poor Patient Outcome Depends on the Tumour's TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion Status

机译:长前列腺癌的关联表达PDE4D转录物对患者结果不良取决于肿瘤的TMPRSS2-ERG融合状态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. To investigate the added value of assessing transcripts for the long cAMP phosphodiesterase-4D (PDE4D) isoforms, PDE4D5 and PDE4D9, regarding the prognostic power of the 'CAPRA & PDE4D7' combination risk model to predict longitudinal postsurgical biological outcomes in prostate cancer. Patients and Methods. RNA was extracted from both biopsy punches of resected tumours (606 patients; RP cohort) and diagnostic needle biopsies (168 patients; DB cohort). RT-qPCR was performed in order to determine PDE4D5, PDE4D7, and PDE4D9 transcript scores in both study cohorts. By RNA sequencing, we determined the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion status of each tumour sample in the RP cohort. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were then applied to correlate the PDE4D5, PDE4D7 and PDE4D9 scores with postsurgical patient outcomes. Logistic regression was then used to combine the clinical CAPRA score with PDE4D5, PDE4D7, and PDE4D9 scores in order to build a 'CAPRA & PDE4D5/7/9' regression model. ROC and decision curve analysis was used to estimate the net benefit of the 'CAPRA & PDE4D5/7/9' risk model. Results. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, on the RP cohort, revealed a significant association of the PDE4D7 score with postsurgical biochemical recurrence (BCR) in the presence of the TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangement (logrank p<0.0001), compared to the absence of this gene fusion event (logrank p=0.08). In contrast, the PDE4D5 score was only significantly associated with BCR in TMPRSS2-ERG fusion negative tumours (logrankp<0.0001 vs. logrankp=0.4 for TMPRSS2-ERG+ tumours). This was similar for the PDE4D9 score although less pronounced compared to that of the PDE4D5 score (TMPRSS2ERG- logrank p<0.0001 vs. TMPRSS2ERG+ logrank p<0.005). In order to predict BCR after primary treatment, we undertook ROC analysis of the logistic regression combination model of the CAPRA score with the PDE4D5, PDE4D7, and PDE4D9 scores. For the DB cohort, this demonstrated significant differences in the AUC between the CAPRA and the PDE4D5/7/9 regression model vs. the CAPRA and PDE4D7 risk model (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.82; p=0.049) vs. the CAPRA score alone (AUC 0.87 vs. 0.77; p=0.005). The CAPRA and PDE4D5/7/9 risk model stratified 19.2% patients of the DB cohort to either 'no risk of biochemical relapse' (NPV100%) or the 'start of any secondary treatment (NPV 100%)', over a follow-up period of up to 15 years. Decision curve analysis presented a clear, net benefit for the use of the novel CAPRA & PDE4D5/7/9 risk model compared to the clinical CAPRA score alone or the CAPRA and PDE4D7 model across all decision thresholds. Conclusion. Association of the long PDE4D5, PDE4D7, and PDE4D9 transcript scores to prostate cancer patient outcome, after primary intervention, varies in opposite directions depending on the TMPRSS2-ERG genomic fusion background of the tumour. Adding transcript scores for the long PDE4D isoforms, PDE4D5 and PDE4D9, to our previously presented combination risk model of the combined 'CAPRA & PDE4D7' score, in order to generate the CAPRA and PDE4D5/7/9 score, significantly improves the prognostic power of the model in predicting postsurgical biological outcomes in prostate cancer patients.
机译:目标。研究评估长cAMP磷酸二酯酶-4D(PDE4D)亚型、PDE4D5和PDE4D9转录本的附加值,以及“CAPRA和PDE4D7”组合风险模型预测前列腺癌术后纵向生物学结果的预后能力。患者和方法。从切除的肿瘤(606名患者;RP队列)和诊断针活检(168名患者;DB队列)的活检穿孔中提取RNA。进行RT-qPCR以确定两个研究队列中的PDE4D5、PDE4D7和PDE4D9转录本得分。通过RNA测序,我们确定RP队列中每个肿瘤样本的TMPRSS2-ERG融合状态。然后应用Kaplan-Meier生存分析将PDE4D5、PDE4D7和PDE4D9评分与术后患者结果相关联。然后使用逻辑回归将临床CAPRA评分与PDE4D5、PDE4D7和PDE4D9评分相结合,以建立“CAPRA和PDE4D5/7/9”回归模型。ROC和决策曲线分析用于估算“CAPRA和PDE4D5/7/9”风险模型的净效益。后果RP队列的Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,与不存在该基因融合事件(logrank p=0.08)相比,存在TMPRSS2-ERG基因重排(logrank p<0.0001)时,PDE4D7评分与术后生化复发(BCR)显著相关。相比之下,PDE4D5评分仅与TMPRSS2-ERG融合阴性肿瘤的BCR显著相关(对于TMPRSS2-ERG+肿瘤,logrankp<0.0001,而logrankp=0.4)。这与PDE4D9评分相似,但与PDE4D5评分相比不太明显(TMPRSS2ERG-对数秩p<0.0001与TMPRSS2ERG+对数秩p<0.005)。为了预测初次治疗后的BCR,我们对CAPRA评分与PDE4D5、PDE4D7和PDE4D9评分的逻辑回归组合模型进行了ROC分析。对于DB队列,这表明CAPRA和PDE4D5/7/9回归模型与CAPRA和PDE4D7风险模型之间的AUC存在显著差异(AUC 0.87 vs.0.82;p=0.049)与单独的CAPRA评分(AUC 0.87 vs.0.77;p=0.005)。在长达15年的随访期内,CAPRA和PDE4D5/7/9风险模型将19.2%的DB队列患者分层为“无生化复发风险”(NPV100%)或“开始任何二级治疗(NPV100%)”。决策曲线分析表明,与单独的临床CAPRA评分或所有决策阈值的CAPRA和PDE4D7模型相比,使用新型CAPRA和PDE4D5/7/9风险模型有明显的净效益。结论主要干预后,长PDE4D5、PDE4D7和PDE4D9转录本得分与前列腺癌患者预后的相关性在相反的方向上变化,这取决于肿瘤的TMPRSS2-ERG基因组融合背景。将长PDE4D亚型PDE4D5和PDE4D9的转录本评分添加到我们之前提出的“CAPRA和PDE4D7”综合评分的组合风险模型中,以生成CAPRA和PDE4D5/7/9评分,显著提高了该模型预测前列腺癌患者术后生物学结果的预测能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号