首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological sciences >Sneeze to leave: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) use variable quorum thresholds facilitated by sneezes in collective decisions
【24h】

Sneeze to leave: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) use variable quorum thresholds facilitated by sneezes in collective decisions

机译:打喷嚏离开:非洲野狗(Lycaon pictus)使用集体决策中的打喷嚏促进的可变法定阈值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In despotically driven animal societies, one or a few individuals tend to have a disproportionate influence on group decision-making and actions. However, global communication allows each group member to assess the relative strength of preferences for different options among their group-mates. Here, we investigate collective decisions by free-ranging African wild dog packs in Botswana. African wild dogs exhibit dominant-directed group living and take part in stereotyped social rallies: high energy greeting ceremonies that occur before collectivemovements. Not all rallies result in collective movements, for reasons that are not well understood. We show that the probability of rally success (i.e. group departure) is predicted by a minimum number of audible rapid nasal exhalations (sneezes), within the rally. Moreover, the number of sneezes needed for the group to depart (i.e. the quorum) was reduced whenever dominant individuals initiated rallies, suggesting that dominant participation increases the likelihood of a rally's success, but is not a prerequisite. As such, the 'will of the group' may override dominant preferences when the consensus of subordinates is sufficiently great. Our findings illustrate how specific behavioural mechanisms (here, sneezing) allow for negotiation (in effect, voting) that shapes decision-making in a wild, socially complex animal society.
机译:在专制驱动的动物社会中,一个或几个个体往往会对群体决策和行动产生不成比例的影响。然而,全球沟通允许每个组员评估组员对不同选项的偏好的相对强度。在这里,我们调查了博茨瓦纳自由放养的非洲野狗群的集体决定。非洲野狗表现出主导性的群体生活,并参加刻板的社会集会:在集体运动之前举行的高能问候仪式。并非所有的集会都会导致集体运动,其原因尚不清楚。我们表明,通过在拉力赛中听到最小数量的快速鼻息(喷嚏),可以预测拉力赛成功(即团体出发)的概率。此外,每当主导个体发起集会时,群体离开所需的喷嚏次数(即法定人数)就会减少,这表明主导参与增加了集会成功的可能性,但不是前提条件。因此,当下属的共识足够大时,“群体意志”可能会压倒主导偏好。我们的发现说明了特定的行为机制(这里是打喷嚏)如何允许协商(实际上是投票),从而在一个野生的、社会复杂的动物社会中影响决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号