Abst'/> Reply to comment by Ngako and Njonfang on “The Adamawa-Yade domain, a piece of Archaean crust in the Neoproterozoic Central African Orogenic belt (Bafia area, Cameroon)”, by Jacqueline Tchakounté et al., Precambrian Research 299 (2017) 210–229
首页> 外文期刊>Precambrian Research >Reply to comment by Ngako and Njonfang on “The Adamawa-Yade domain, a piece of Archaean crust in the Neoproterozoic Central African Orogenic belt (Bafia area, Cameroon)”, by Jacqueline Tchakounté et al., Precambrian Research 299 (2017) 210–229
【24h】

Reply to comment by Ngako and Njonfang on “The Adamawa-Yade domain, a piece of Archaean crust in the Neoproterozoic Central African Orogenic belt (Bafia area, Cameroon)”, by Jacqueline Tchakounté et al., Precambrian Research 299 (2017) 210–229

机译:回复Ngako和Njonfang关于“亚明川义域,这是一款纪念星杂交中非orenceancic带(Bafia地区,喀麦隆)的一块拱洲地壳”,通过JacquelineTchakounté等人。,Precambrian Research 299(2017)210- 229.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractV. Ngako and E. Njonfang addressed in their comment an interesting and debated issue about the collision geodynamics of the Pan-African Central African Orogenic Belt (CAOB) in Cameroon. However, the reason for this comment is still not clear to us since it mainly deals with issues far away from the scope of our study, namely, the pre-collisional set up of the belt. The comment raises two main points – the reworking process during plate collision and the Pan-African strain pattern – not discussed in our paper for the simple reason that it was not our goal and because our data set does not even allow such discussion. Having said that, the comment gives us the opportunity to clarify our view on the nature of the Adamawa-Yade domain (Central Cameroon) and the early evolution of the CAOB. We will successively discuss two other points raised in the comment: (1) our Fig. 12 depicting a possible pre-collisional configuration at the northern and southern margin of the Congo craton in the Early Neoproterozoic, and (2) the nature and extent of the Adamawa-Yade domain.]]>
机译:摘要V.Ngako和E.Njonfang在他们的评论中谈到了一个关于泛非-中非造山带(CAOB)碰撞地球动力学的有趣且有争议的问题在喀麦隆。然而,我们仍然不清楚发表这一评论的原因,因为它主要涉及远离我们研究范围的问题,即碰撞前构造带。该评论提出了两个主要观点——板块碰撞期间的返工过程和泛非应变模式——我们的论文没有讨论,原因很简单,这不是我们的目标,因为我们的数据集甚至不允许这样的讨论。话虽如此,该评论让我们有机会澄清我们对阿达马瓦-亚德地区(喀麦隆中部)性质和CAOB早期演化的看法。我们将依次讨论评论中提出的其他两点:(1)我们的图12描绘了新元古代早期刚果克拉通南北边缘可能的碰撞前构造,以及(2)阿达马瓦-亚德域的性质和范围]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号