首页> 外文期刊>Phlebology >UK primary care survey of venous leg ulceration management and referral – Post-EVRA trial
【24h】

UK primary care survey of venous leg ulceration management and referral – Post-EVRA trial

机译:静脉腿部溃疡管理和推荐的英国初级保健调查 - EVRA审判后

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Determine standards of referral and management of patients with venous leg ulceration in primary care after the release of the EVRA (A Randomized Trial of Early Endovenous Ablation in Venous Ulceration) study results. Methods An online questionnaire was disseminated over four months to professionals working within primary care. Results The survey received 643 responses. Of respondents, 90 (14%) had heard of the EVRA trial and 51 (8%) were familiar with the results. Of those who answered the following questions, 410 (69.1%) stated that referral to a vascular specialist must be made by the General Practitioner and 13 (2.2%) reported that they would always refer patients for secondary care assessment before the publication of EVRA. Considering the EVRA results, 128 (29%) reported that they would change practice regarding referral and would experience no barriers and 198 (45%) reported that they would like to refer earlier but is not their decision. Barriers to changing practice included local referral policies, training and time restrictions, 266 (59%) had heard of the NICE guideline (CG168) and 194 (43%) were aware of the recommendations for referral to a vascular service within two weeks for patients with an open or healed ulcer. Conclusion There is a considerable variation in local referral pathways for venous leg ulceration, and despite clinicians wanting to refer promptly, many primary care professionals are unable to. Unfortunately, the EVRA study alone may not change the overall practice, and work is needed to overcome barriers faced by primary care professionals.
机译:目的确定EVRA(静脉溃疡早期腔内消融术的随机试验)研究结果发布后,初级保健中静脉性腿部溃疡患者的转诊和管理标准。方法通过四个月的时间向从事初级保健工作的专业人员发放在线问卷。结果调查共收到643份回复。在受访者中,90人(14%)听说过EVRA试验,51人(8%)熟悉试验结果。在回答以下问题的人中,410人(69.1%)表示必须由全科医生转诊至血管专科医生,13人(2.2%)报告称,他们会在EVRA发布前将患者转诊至二级护理评估。考虑到EVRA的结果,128人(29%)表示他们将改变转诊的做法,不会遇到任何障碍,198人(45%)表示他们希望提前转诊,但这不是他们的决定。改变实践的障碍包括当地转诊政策、培训和时间限制,266人(59%)听说过NICE指南(CG168),194人(43%)知道开放性或治愈性溃疡患者在两周内转诊到血管服务的建议。结论下肢静脉溃疡的局部转诊路径存在很大差异,尽管临床医生希望及时转诊,但许多初级保健专业人员无法做到。不幸的是,仅EVRA研究可能无法改变整体实践,需要努力克服初级保健专业人员面临的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号