首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences >Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity
【24h】

Non-human primates use combined rules when deciding under ambiguity

机译:非人类灵长类动物在歧义下决定时使用组合规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Decision outcomes in unpredictable environments may not have exact known probabilities. Yet the predictability level of outcomes matters in decisions, and animals, including humans, generally avoid ambiguous options. Managing ambiguity may be more challenging and requires stronger cognitive skills than decision-making under risk, where decisions involve known probabilities. Here we compare decision-making in capuchins, macaques, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos in risky and ambiguous contexts. Subjects were shown lotteries (a tray of potential rewards, some large, some small) and could gamble a medium-sized food item to obtain one of the displayed rewards. The odds of winning and losing varied and were accessible in the risky context (all rewards were visible) or partially available in the ambiguous context (some rewards were covered). In the latter case, the level of information varied from fully ambiguous (individuals could not guess what was under the covers) to predictable (individuals could guess). None of the species avoided gambling in ambiguous lotteries and gambling rates were high if at least two large rewards were visible. Capuchins and bonobos ignored the covered items and gorillas and macaques took the presence of potential rewards into account, but only chimpanzees and orangutans could consistently build correct expectations about the size of the covered rewards. Chimpanzees and orangutans combined decision rules according to the number of large visible rewards and the level of predictability, a process resembling conditional probabilities assessment in humans. Despite a low sample size, this is the first evidence in non-human primates that a combination of several rules can underlie choices made in an unpredictable environment. Our finding that non-human primates can deal with the uncertainty of an outcome when exchanging one food item for another is a key element to the understanding of the evolutionary origins of economic behaviour.
机译:不可预测环境中的决策结果可能没有确切的已知概率。然而,结果的可预测性水平在决策中很重要,包括人类在内的动物通常会避免模棱两可的选择。与风险决策相比,管理歧义可能更具挑战性,需要更强的认知技能,因为风险决策涉及已知的概率。在这里,我们比较了卷尾猴、猕猴、猩猩、大猩猩、黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩在风险和模糊环境中的决策。向受试者展示彩票(一盘可能的奖品,一些大的,一些小的),并可以赌一个中等大小的食物来获得其中一个显示的奖品。赢家和输家的几率各不相同,在有风险的情况下(所有奖励都是可见的),或者在模棱两可的情况下(一些奖励被覆盖)部分可用。在后一种情况下,信息的级别从完全模糊(个人无法猜到封面下的内容)到可预测(个人可以猜到)不等。没有一个物种能够避免在不明确的彩票中赌博,如果至少有两个大奖赏是可见的,那么赌博率很高。卷尾猴和倭黑猩猩忽略了覆盖的物品,大猩猩和猕猴也考虑了潜在奖励的存在,但只有黑猩猩和猩猩才能始终如一地对覆盖奖励的大小建立正确的预期。黑猩猩和猩猩根据大量可见奖励的数量和可预测性水平组合决策规则,这一过程类似于人类的条件概率评估。尽管样本量很小,但这是首次在非人灵长类动物身上证明,在不可预测的环境中,多种规则的组合可以作为做出选择的基础。我们发现,非人类灵长类动物在交换一种食物时能够应对结果的不确定性,这是理解经济行为进化起源的关键因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号