...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences >The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: a data-driven approach
【24h】

The cognitive and perceptual correlates of ideological attitudes: a data-driven approach

机译:思想态度的认知和感知相关性:数据驱动方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although human existence is enveloped by ideologies, remarkably little is understood about the relationships between ideological attitudes and psychological traits. Even less is known about how cognitive dispositions-individual differences in how information is perceived and processed- sculpt individuals' ideological worldviews, proclivities for extremist beliefs and resistance (or receptivity) to evidence. Using an unprecedented number of cognitive tasks (n = 37) and personality surveys (n = 22), along with data-driven analyses including drift-diffusion and Bayesian modelling, we uncovered the specific psychological signatures of political, nationalistic, religious and dogmatic beliefs. Cognitive and personality assessments consistently outperformed demographic predictors in accounting for individual differences in ideological preferences by 4 to 15-fold. Furthermore, data-driven analyses revealed that individuals' ideological attitudes mirrored their cognitive decision-making strategies. Conservatism and nationalism were related to greater caution in perceptual decision-making tasks and to reduced strategic information processing, while dogmatism was associated with slower evidence accumulation and impulsive tendencies. Religiosity was implicated in heightened agreeableness and risk perception. Extreme pro-group attitudes, including violence endorsement against outgroups, were linked to poorer working memory, slower perceptual strategies, and tendencies towards impulsivity and sensation-seeking-reflecting overlaps with the psychological profiles of conservatism and dogmatism. Cognitive and personality signatures were also generated for ideologies such as authoritarianism, system justification, social dominance orientation, patriotism and receptivity to evidence or alternative viewpoints; elucidating their underpinnings and highlighting avenues for future research. Together these findings suggest that ideological worldviews may be reflective of low-level perceptual and cognitive functions. This article is part of the theme issue 'The political brain: neurocognitive and computational mechanisms'.
机译:尽管人类的存在被意识形态所包围,但人们对意识形态态度和心理特征之间的关系却知之甚少。关于认知倾向如何影响个体对信息的感知和处理——塑造个体的意识形态世界观、极端主义信仰倾向以及对证据的抵抗(或接受)的差异,我们所知更少。使用前所未有的认知任务(n=37)和个性调查(n=22),以及数据驱动的分析,包括漂移扩散和贝叶斯建模,我们发现了政治、民族主义、宗教和教条信仰的具体心理特征。在解释意识形态偏好的个体差异方面,认知和人格评估始终比人口统计学预测值高出4到15倍。此外,数据驱动的分析显示,个人的意识形态态度反映了他们的认知决策策略。保守主义和民族主义与在知觉决策任务中更加谨慎和减少战略信息处理有关,而教条主义与较慢的证据积累和冲动倾向有关。宗教信仰与更高的宜人性和风险感知有关。极端亲群体态度,包括对外部群体的暴力支持,与工作记忆较差、知觉策略较慢、冲动和感觉寻求倾向有关,反映出保守主义和教条主义的心理特征重叠。还产生了威权主义、制度正当性、社会主导取向、爱国主义和对证据或替代观点的接受等意识形态的认知和人格特征;阐明它们的基础,并强调未来研究的途径。这些发现共同表明,意识形态世界观可能反映了低水平的知觉和认知功能。这篇文章是“政治大脑:神经认知和计算机制”主题的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号