首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric cardiology >High Acuity Therapy Variation Across Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Units: Results from the Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative Hospital Surveys
【24h】

High Acuity Therapy Variation Across Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Units: Results from the Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative Hospital Surveys

机译:跨小儿急性护理心脏病学单位的高敏锐治疗变异:小儿急性护理心脏病学合作医院调查结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We utilized the multicenter Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative (PAC(3)) 2017 and 2019 surveys to describe practice variation in therapy availability and changes over a 2-year period. A high acuity therapies (ATs) score was derived (1 point per positive response) from 44 survey questions and scores were compared to center surgical volume. Of 31 centers that completed the 2017 survey, 26 also completed the 2019 survey. Scores ranged from 11 to 34 in 2017 and 11 to 35 in 2019. AT scores in 2019 were not statistically different from 2017 scores (29/44, IQR 27-32.5 vs. 29.5/44, IQR 27-31, p = 0.9). In 2019, more centers reported initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in Acute Care Cardiology Unit (ACCU) (19/26 vs. 4/26, p < 0.001) and permitting continuous CPAP/BiPAP (22/26 vs. 14/26, p = 0.034) compared to 2017. Scores in both survey years were significantly higher in the highest surgical volume group compared to the lowest, 33 +/- 1.5 versus 25 +/- 8.5, p = 0.046 and 32 +/- 1.7 versus 23 +/- 5.5, p = 0.009, respectively. Variation in therapy within the ACCUs participating in PAC(3) presents an opportunity for shared learning across the collaborative. Experience with PAC(3) was associated with increasing available respiratory therapies from 2017 to 2019. Whether AT scores impact the quality and outcomes of pediatric acute cardiac care will be the subject of further investigation using a comprehensive registry launched in early 2019.
机译:我们利用2017年和2019年的多中心儿科急性护理心脏病学协作(PAC(3))调查,描述了两年期间治疗可用性和变化的实践变化。从44个调查问题中得出高敏度治疗(ATs)得分(每个阳性反应1分),并将得分与中心手术量进行比较。在完成2017年调查的31个中心中,26个也完成了2019年的调查。2017年的分数为11到34分,2019年的分数为11到35分。2019年的AT分数与2017年的分数没有统计学差异(29/44,IQR 27-32.5与29.5/44,IQR 27-31,p=0.9)。2019年,与2017年相比,更多中心报告在急性心脏病监护室(ACCU)开始持续气道正压(CPAP)和双水平气道正压(BiPAP)(19/26比4/26,p<0.001)并允许持续CPAP/BiPAP(22/26比14/26,p=0.034)。两个调查年中,手术量最高组的得分显著高于手术量最低组,分别为33+/-1.5分和25+/-8.5分,p=0.046和32+/-1.7分和23+/-5.5分,p=0.009。参与PAC(3)的ACCU内的治疗差异为整个协作团队提供了共享学习的机会。从2017年到2019年,PAC(3)的经验与增加可用的呼吸疗法有关。AT分数是否会影响儿科急性心脏病护理的质量和结果,将使用2019年初启动的综合登记进行进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号