...
首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologic Oncology: An International Journal >Does hormonal contraception during molar pregnancy follow-up influence the risk and clinical aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after controlling for risk factors?
【24h】

Does hormonal contraception during molar pregnancy follow-up influence the risk and clinical aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after controlling for risk factors?

机译:摩尔妊娠后的激素避孕是否会影响妊娠期孕产性肿瘤肿瘤后的风险和临床攻击性危险因素?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Highlights ? Hormone contraception does not increase the risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. ? Hormone contraception does not alter severity of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. ? Hormone contraception does not delay hCG regression. Abstract Objective To evaluate the influence of hormonal contraception (HC) on the development and clinical aggressiveness of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) and the time for normalization of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted with women diagnosed with molar pregnancy, followed at the Rio de Janeiro Trophoblastic Disease Center, between January 2005 and January 2015. The occurrence of postmolar GTN and the time for hCG normalization between users of HC or barrier methods (BM) during the postmolar follow-up or GTN treatment were evaluated. Results Among 2828 patients included in this study, 2680 (95%) used HC and 148 (5%) used BM. The use of HC did not significantly influence the occurrence of GTN (ORa: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.24–1.12, p=0.060), despite different formulations: progesterone-only (ORa: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.29–1.01, p=0.060) or combined oral contraception (COC) (ORa: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27–1.01, p=0.60) or with different dosages of ethinyl estradiol: 15mcg (ORa, 1.33, 95% CI 0.79–2.24, p=0.288), 20mcg (ORa: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.64–1.65, p=0.901), 30mcg (ORa: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.78–1.75, p=0.437) or 35mcg (ORa: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.42–1.39, p=0.386). Time to hCG normalization ≥10weeks (ORa: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43–1.08, p=0.071) or time to remission with chemotherapy≥14weeks (ORa: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43–1.09, p=0.067) did not significantly differ among HC users when compared to patients using BM, when controlling for other risk factors using multivariate logistic regression. Conclusions The use of HC during postmolar follow-up or GTN treatment does not seem to increase the risk of GTN or its severity and does not postpone the normalization of hCG levels.
机译:None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号