...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of allergy, asthma, and immunology >ARE SAFETY NEEDLES SAFER THAN TRADITIONAL NEEDLES?
【24h】

ARE SAFETY NEEDLES SAFER THAN TRADITIONAL NEEDLES?

机译:安全针比传统针还安全吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Wolf et al recently investigated the benefits of safety needle use in allergy practices. In view of their recommendation to question and possibly revise the Occupational and Safety Health Administration guidelines, their study requires some scrutiny.With this retrospective e-mail survey, the authors conclude that there is an approximately 2-fold increase in accidental needle stick (ANS) injuries with safety needles compared with traditional needles. Although they acknowledge that there may be limitations with a retrospective e-mail survey study design, they do not discuss a number of significant biases. These limitations and biases (also present in the previous similar study by Kanter et al2) are numerous and significant enough to make the data almost impossible to interpret
机译:Wolf等人最近研究了在过敏实践中使用安全针的好处。鉴于他们提出的质疑和可能修订《职业与安全卫生管理局指南》的建议,他们的研究需要进行仔细审查。通过这项回顾性电子邮件调查,作者得出结论,意外针刺(ANS)大约增加了2倍。 )与传统针相比,安全针受伤。尽管他们承认回顾性电子邮件调查研究设计可能存在局限性,但他们并未讨论许多重大偏见。这些局限性和偏见(同样存在于坎特等人先前的类似研究中)也足够多且意义重大,以致于几乎无法解释数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号