Endoscopic treatment of fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy: a?comparison of internal drainage versus closure

摘要

Background and Aims Fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy are major adverse events of bariatric surgery. The endoscopic management strategy evolved from closure to internal drainage after 2013. The main objective of our study was to evaluate and compare these different approaches. Methods This retrospective study included all patients treated for fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy in a referral center. Closure management was defined as initial treatment that used a covered metal stent and/or endoclips. Internal drainage management was defined as initial treatment by nasocystic drain and/or a double-pigtail stent. Results A total of 100 patients (women N?= 78, mean [± standard deviation {SD}] age 42 ± 12 years) were included between 2007 and 2015. The mean (± SD) delay between sleeve gastrectomy and the first endoscopy was 82 ± 125 days. The overall success of endoscopic treatment was 86% within 6 ± 27 months. Two patients died. The primary success of internal drainage and closure management occurred in 19 of 22 (86%) and 49 of 77 (63%) patients, respectively. Among patients in failure for closure management, 22 had secondary internal drainage (18 being successful). Success of initial management was significantly higher for internal drainage ( P ?= .043). Factors associated with failure of closure management were in multivariable analysis: collection >5?cm ( P ?= .013). Factors associated with a time >6 months for achieving leakage closure were in multivariable analysis: reoperation before endoscopy ( P ?= .044) and purulent flow at endoscopy ( P ?= .043). Conclusions Endoscopic management of fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy was successful in 86% of cases. In cases of collections >5 cm, internal drainage should be proposed first. Surgical reintervention before endoscopy delays treatment success. Graphical abstract Display Omitted