...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Neurophysiology >The influence of tDCS intensity on decision-making training and transfer outcomes.
【24h】

The influence of tDCS intensity on decision-making training and transfer outcomes.

机译:TDCS强度对决策培训和转移结果的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve single- and dual-task performance in healthy participants and enhance transferable training gains following multiple sessions of combined stimulation and task practice. However, it has yet to be determined what the optimal stimulation dose is for facilitating such outcomes. We aimed to test the effects of different tDCS intensities, with a commonly used electrode montage, on performance outcomes in a multisession single/dual-task training and transfer protocol. In a preregistered study, 123 participants, who were pseudorandomized across four groups, each completed six sessions (pre- and posttraining sessions and four combined tDCS and training sessions) and received 20?min of prefrontal anodal tDCS at 0.7, 1.0, or 2.0?mA or 15-s sham stimulation. Response time and accuracy were assessed in trained and untrained tasks. The 1.0-mA group showed substantial improvements in single-task reaction time and dual-task accuracy, with additional evidence for improvements in dual-task reaction times, relative to sham performance. This group also showed near transfer to the single-task component of an untrained multitasking paradigm. The 0.7- and 2.0-mA intensities varied in which performance measures they improved on the trained task, but in sum, the effects were less robust than for the 1.0-mA group, and there was no evidence for the transfer of performance. Our study highlights that training performance gains are augmented by tDCS, but their magnitude and nature are not uniform across stimulation intensity. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate cognitive performance is an alluring endeavor. However, the optimal parameters to augment performance are unknown. Here, in a preregistered study with a large sample (123 subjects), three different stimulation dosages (0.7, 1.0, and 2.0?mA) were applied during multitasking training. Different cognitive training performance outcomes occurred across the dosage conditions, with only one of the doses (1.0?mA) leading to training transfer.
机译:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被证明可以改善健康参与者的单任务和双任务表现,并在多次联合刺激和任务练习后提高可转移的训练收益。然而,促进这些结果的最佳刺激剂量尚未确定。我们的目的是在多阶段单/双任务训练和传输协议中,使用常用的电极蒙太奇,测试不同tDCS强度对性能结果的影响。在一项预先注册的研究中,123名参与者被伪随机分为四组,每个参与者完成了六个疗程(训练前和训练后的疗程以及四个TDC和训练课程的组合),并接受了20个?0.7、1.0或2.0时前额阳极TDC的最小值?mA或15秒假刺激。在经过培训和未经培训的任务中评估反应时间和准确性。1.0-mA组在单任务反应时间和双任务准确性方面有显著改善,与假动作相比,有更多证据表明双任务反应时间有所改善。这组人还表现出了对未经训练的多任务范式中单一任务部分的近乎转移。0.7-mA和2.0-mA强度各不相同,在训练任务中,他们改善了绩效指标,但总的来说,效果不如1.0-mA组,并且没有证据表明绩效转移。我们的研究强调,训练成绩的提高是由TDC增加的,但它们的大小和性质在刺激强度上并不一致。使用经颅直流电刺激等新技术来调节认知能力是一项诱人的尝试。然而,提高性能的最佳参数是未知的。在此,在一项预先登记的大样本研究(123名受试者)中,在多任务训练期间应用了三种不同的刺激剂量(0.7、1.0和2.0?mA)。不同剂量条件下的认知训练表现结果不同,只有一种剂量(1.0毫安)会导致训练转移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号