首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >A comparison between advanced hybrid machine learning algorithms and empirical equations applied to abutment scour depth prediction
【24h】

A comparison between advanced hybrid machine learning algorithms and empirical equations applied to abutment scour depth prediction

机译:高级混合机学习算法与应用于基础冲刷深度预测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Complex vortex flow patterns around bridge piers, especially during floods, cause scour process that can result in the failure of foundations. Abutment scour is a complex three-dimensional phenomenon that is difficult to predict especially with traditional formulas obtained using empirical approaches such as regressions. This paper presents a test of a standalone Kstar model with five novel hybrid algorithm of bagging (BA-Kstar), dagging (DA-Kstar), random committee (RC-Kstar), random subspace (RS-Kstar), and weighted instance handler wrapper (WIHWKstar) to predict scour depth (ds) for clear water condition. The dataset consists of 99 scour depth data from flume experiments (Dey and Barbhuiya, 2005) using abutment shapes such as vertical, semicircular and 45 degrees wing. Four dimensionless parameter of relative flow depth (h/l), excess abutment Froude number (Fe), relative sediment size (d(50)/l) and relative submergence (d(50)/h) were considered for the prediction of relative scour depth (d(s)/l). A portion of the dataset was used for the calibration (70%), and the remaining used for model validation. Pearson correlation coefficients helped deciding relevance of the input parameters combination and finally four different combinations of input parameters were used. The performance of the models was assessed visually and with quantitative metrics. Overall, the best input combination for vertical abutment shape is the combination of F-e, d(50)/l and h/l, while for semicircular and 45 degrees wing the combination of the Fe and d(50)/l is the most effective input parameter combination. Our results show that incorporating Fe, d(50)/l and h/l lead to higher performance while involving d(50)/h reduced the models prediction power for vertical abutment shape and for semicircular and 45 degrees wing involving h/l and d(50)/h lead to more error. The WIHW-Kstar provided the highest performance in scour depth prediction around vertical abutment shape while RC-Kstar model outperform of other models for scour depth prediction around semicircular and 45 degrees wing.
机译:桥墩周围复杂的涡流模式,尤其是在洪水期间,会导致冲刷过程,从而导致基础失效。桥台冲刷是一种复杂的三维现象,很难预测,尤其是使用回归等经验方法获得的传统公式。本文介绍了一个独立的Kstar模型的测试,该模型包含五种新的混合算法,即bagging(BA-Kstar)、Dag(DA-Kstar)、random committee(RC-Kstar)、random subspace(RS-Kstar)和加权实例处理程序包装器(WIHWKstar),用于预测清水条件下的冲刷深度(ds)。该数据集包括99个水槽试验(Dey和Barbhuiya,2005年)的冲刷深度数据,使用了垂直、半圆形和45度机翼等桥台形状。在预测相对冲刷深度(d(s)/l时,考虑了相对水流深度(h/l)、超坝肩弗劳德数(Fe)、相对泥沙粒径(d(50)/l)和相对淹没度(d(50)/h)四个无量纲参数。数据集的一部分用于校准(70%),其余部分用于模型验证。皮尔逊相关系数有助于确定输入参数组合的相关性,最后使用了四种不同的输入参数组合。模型的性能通过视觉和定量指标进行评估。总体而言,垂直桥台形状的最佳输入组合是F-e、d(50)/l和h/l的组合,而对于半圆形和45度机翼,Fe和d(50)/l的组合是最有效的输入参数组合。我们的研究结果表明,加入Fe、d(50)/l和h/l会导致更高的性能,而加入d(50)/h会降低模型对垂直桥台形状的预测能力,而加入h/l和d(50)/h的半圆和45度机翼会导致更大的误差。WIHW Kstar模型在垂直桥台形状周围的冲刷深度预测方面提供了最高的性能,而RC Kstar模型在半圆形和45度机翼周围的冲刷深度预测方面优于其他模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号