...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology >Groundwater level modeling with hybrid artificial intelligence techniques
【24h】

Groundwater level modeling with hybrid artificial intelligence techniques

机译:具有混合式人工智能技术的地下水位模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

It is necessary to properly simulate groundwater levels in order to ensure an adequate management of scarce water resources. However, simulating groundwater levels accurately is one of the challenging issues in hydrology because of its complex system. In the current study, Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and M5 model tree (M5) are combined with Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) and Complementary Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMD) methods for pre-processing input data to produce hybrid models for groundwater simulation. The performance of hybrid models is compared with the outputs of sole GEP and M5 and their counterparts combined with Wavelet transform (WT). The results indicate that pre-processing can improve the performance of the simple models and WT as well as CEEMD are better than EEMD to produce hybrid models. By employing pre-processing techniques, the improvement of R-2 for GEP and M5, regarding Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) as a benchmark, is 13.11%, 6.65% and 8.20% for EEMD-GEP, CEEMD-GEP and CEEMD-M5 respectively, while it is -3.28% for EEMD-M5 for the first data set. For the second data set, the improvement of EEMD-GEP = 103.23%, CEEMD-GEP = 125.81% and CEEMD-M5 = 77.42%, and for the third data set, EEMD-GEP = 76%, CEEMD-GEP = 80% and CEEMD-M5 = 54%. In the second and third data set, the performance of EEMD-M5 decreases again. According to the results, hybrid GEP shows the best performance for groundwater water simulation, while M5 combined with EEMD is not recommended for the simulation due to its weak performance.
机译:有必要适当模拟地下水位,以确保对稀缺水资源进行充分管理。然而,由于地下水系统的复杂性,准确模拟地下水位是水文学中具有挑战性的问题之一。在当前的研究中,基因表达式编程(GEP)和M5模型树(M5)与集成经验模式分解(EEMD)和互补集成经验模式分解(CEEMD)方法相结合,对输入数据进行预处理,生成地下水模拟的混合模型。将混合模型的性能与单一GEP和M5的输出以及它们与小波变换(WT)相结合的输出进行了比较。结果表明,预处理可以提高简单模型的性能,WT和CEEMD在生成混合模型方面优于EEMD。通过采用预处理技术,以多元线性回归(MLR)为基准,GEP和M5的R-2改善率分别为EEMD-GEP、CEEMD-GEP和CEEMD-M5的13.11%、6.65%和8.20%,而EEMD-M5的改善率为-3.28%。对于第二个数据集,EEMD-GEP=103.23%,CEEMD-GEP=125.81%,CEEMD-M5=77.42%,对于第三个数据集,EEMD-GEP=76%,CEEMD-GEP=80%,CEEMD-M5=54%。在第二和第三个数据集中,EEMD-M5的性能再次下降。结果表明,混合GEP在地下水模拟中表现出最好的性能,而M5与EEMD的结合由于其性能较弱,不推荐用于模拟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号