首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >Impact of landscape positions on soil erodibility indices in typical vegetation-restored slope-gully systems on the Loess Plateau of China
【24h】

Impact of landscape positions on soil erodibility indices in typical vegetation-restored slope-gully systems on the Loess Plateau of China

机译:景观姿势对中国黄土高原典型植被恢复坡度系统土壤蚀剂指标的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Landscape position of the slope-gully system has considerable effects on the near soil surface characteristics, which in turn affect soil erodibility. However, little attention has been paid to the spatial variation of soil emdibility in vegetation-restored slope-gully systems in arid and semiarid regions. This study aimed to detect spatial variations in the soil emdibility indices of soil cohesion (Coh), saturated conductivity (K-s), aggregate stability (the number of drop impact (NDI) and the mean weight diameter (MWD)), penetration resistance (PR), emdibility K factor, and a comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) under a north-facing slope-gully system (NSG) and a south-facing slope-gully system (SSG) on the Loess Plateau. The results showed that Coh, K-s, NDI, and MWD increased generally from the high to low landscape positions for both the NSG and SSG, whereas PR and K had the opposite trend. Coh, K-s, NDI, and MWD of the NSG were significantly greater than those of the SSG, but PR and K of the NSG were notably lower than those of the SSG. For both the NSG and SSG, the CSEI increased first then declined sharply until reaching the gully floor. For the NSG, the ratios of the CSEI of the summit, upper ridge slope, middle ridge slope, lower ridge slope and gully slope to the CSEI of gully floor were 23.5, 33.7, 28.1, 25.2, and 13.6. For the SSG, these ratios were 2.8, 4.1, 3.8, 3.7, and 2.4. The CSEI of the NSG was significantly less than that of the SSG at all positions, which indicates that the soil erosion resistance of the NSG was significantly greater than that of the SSG. The variations in soil erodibility was attributed to the differences in biological crust thickness, plant litter and root densities, soil bulk density, texture and organic matter content with landscape position and aspect.
机译:坡沟系统的景观位置对近地表特征有很大影响,进而影响土壤的可蚀性。然而,干旱半干旱地区植被恢复坡沟系统土壤适宜性的空间变异研究却很少。本研究旨在检测土壤渗透性指数的空间变化,包括土壤粘聚力(Coh)、饱和电导率(K-s)、骨料稳定性(落锤冲击次数(NDI)和平均重量直径(MWD))、渗透阻力(PR)、渗透性K系数,以及黄土高原北向坡沟系统(NSG)和南向坡沟系统(SSG)下的土壤可蚀性综合指数(CSEI)。结果表明,NSG和SSG的Coh、K-s、NDI和MWD总体上从高到低的景观位置增加,而PR和K的趋势相反。NSG的Coh、K-s、NDI和MWD显著高于SSG,但NSG的PR和K显著低于SSG。对于NSG和SSG,CSEI先增加,然后急剧下降,直到到达沟底。对于NSG,山顶、上脊坡、中脊坡、下脊坡和沟坡的CSEI与沟底的CSEI之比分别为23.5、33.7、28.1、25.2和13.6。对于SSG,这些比率分别为2.8、4.1、3.8、3.7和2.4。在所有位置,NSG的CSEI均显著低于SSG,这表明NSG的土壤抗侵蚀性显著高于SSG。土壤可蚀性的变化归因于生物结皮厚度、植物凋落物和根系密度、土壤容重、质地和有机质含量随景观位置和坡向的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号