...
首页> 外文期刊>Catalysis Today >Effects of preparation method on the properties of cobalt supported beta-zeolite catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis
【24h】

Effects of preparation method on the properties of cobalt supported beta-zeolite catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis

机译:制备方法对Fischer-Tropsch合成的钴负载β-沸石催化剂性能的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The effect of preparation method on the properties of Co supported beta-zeolite catalysts was examined in this study. Co-supported beta-zeolite catalysts (20wt.% Co as Ca3O4) were prepared by impregnation (IMP20), incipient wetness (IW20), physical mixing (PHY20) and precipitation (PCT20) methods and were characterized by various methods including N-2 adsorption (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), H-2 thermal programmed reduction (H-2-TPR), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis was carried out over these catalysts at 230 degrees C and 1 MPa in a fixed-bed flow-type reactor. XPS and H-2-TPR analyses suggest that the catalysts can be ranked in terms of metal-support interactions: PCT20>IMP20 congruent to IW20>PHY20. On the other hand, based on reducibility, the catalysts were ordered as follows: PHY20>IMP20 congruent to IW20>PCT20. The catalytic activity and product selectivity during FT synthesis were also found to depend on the catalyst preparation method. The catalyst prepared by the incipient wetness method exhibited the highest CO conversion with high liquid production, whereas the physically mixed catalyst showed the lowest CO conversion. All the catalysts produced gasoline-range liquid hydrocarbons (C-5 -C-11) mainly and the selectivity towards i-paraffins was more than 60% in the case of the catalyst prepared by precipitation. Furthermore, the composition of liquid products produced over catalysts prepared by the impregnation and incipient wetness methods were similar to each other. Thus, the results of the study clearly show that the physico-chemical properties of the catalysts as well as catalytic activities and product selectivity during the FT reaction strongly depend on the catalyst preparation method. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本研究考察了制备方法对共负载β沸石催化剂性能的影响。采用浸渍法(IMP20)、初湿法(IW20)、物理混合法(PHY20)和沉淀法(PCT20)制备了Co负载β沸石催化剂(20wt.%Co as Ca3O4),并用N-2吸附法(BET)、X射线衍射法(XRD)、X射线光电子能谱法(XPS)、H-2热程序还原法(H-2-TPR)等方法对其进行了表征,和透射电子显微镜(TEM)。在230℃、1mpa的固定床流式反应器中,在这些催化剂上进行了费托合成。XPS和H-2-TPR分析表明,催化剂可以根据金属-载体相互作用进行排序:PCT20>IMP20与IW20>PHY20一致。另一方面,基于可还原性,催化剂的顺序如下:PHY20>IMP20与IW20>PCT20一致。FT合成过程中的催化活性和产物选择性也取决于催化剂的制备方法。采用初湿法制备的催化剂显示出最高的CO转化率和较高的产液量,而物理混合的催化剂显示出最低的CO转化率。所有催化剂均主要产生汽油系液态烃(C-5-C-11),沉淀法制备的催化剂对i-烷烃的选择性大于60%。此外,浸渍法和初期湿润法制备的催化剂上产生的液体产物的组成彼此相似。因此,研究结果清楚地表明,催化剂的物理化学性质以及FT反应期间的催化活性和产物选择性在很大程度上取决于催化剂的制备方法。(C) 2017爱思唯尔B.V.版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号