首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology: A Journal of Imaging in Diagnosis and Treatment >Reperfusion of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Following Embolotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Detachable Versus Pushable Coils
【24h】

Reperfusion of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations Following Embolotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Detachable Versus Pushable Coils

机译:栓塞治疗后肺动脉畸形的再灌注:可拆卸的可拆卸线圈的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose To compare 1 year post-embolization reperfusion rates in pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) treated with the 0.035 '' Interlock (TM) Fibered IDC (TM) Occlusion System coils (IDC) (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) versus 0.035 '' Nester coils (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, Indiana). Materials and Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed randomizing individual PAVMs to treatment with IDC versus Nester coils at the largest hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia center in Canada. The primary outcome was CT evidence of reperfusion at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included periprocedural complications, fluoroscopy time and contrast volume. Results Our study was terminated prematurely due to slow recruitment and subsequent expiration of funding. A total of 46 PAVMs in 25 patients (64% female) were included in our study; 26 randomized to Nester coils and 20 randomized to IDC. One patient was lost to follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 421.2 +/- 215.7 days, no significant difference in PAVM reperfusion was detected between Nester coils and IDC (0% vs. 5.6%, p > 0.05). No major periprocedural complications were noted in either group. Fluoroscopy time (Nester: 15.0 +/- 11.8 min vs. IDC 16.0 +/- 5.4 min, p > 0.05) and contrast volume (Nester: 80.3 +/- 36.5 ml vs. IDC 87.3 +/- 51.7 ml, p > 0.05) utilized did not differ between groups. Conclusion No significant difference was detected in PAVM reperfusion rates, periprocedural complication rates, contrast volume utilization or fluoroscopy time following embolization with IDC and Nester coils.
机译:目的比较0.035英寸联锁(TM)纤维IDC(TM)闭塞系统线圈(IDC)(马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒波士顿科学公司)与0.035英寸奈斯特线圈(印第安纳州布卢明顿库克医疗公司)治疗肺动静脉畸形(PAVMs)栓塞后1年的再灌注率。材料和方法在加拿大最大的遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张中心进行了一项随机对照试验,将个体PAVM随机分为IDC和Nester线圈治疗。主要转归是1年后再灌注的CT证据。次要结果包括围手术期并发症、透视时间和对比剂体积。结果我们的研究因招募缓慢和随后的资金到期而提前终止。我们的研究共包括25名患者中的46名PAVM(64%为女性);26个随机分配给Nester线圈,20个随机分配给IDC。一名患者失去了随访。在平均421.2+/-215.7天的随访中,Nester线圈和IDC之间的PAVM再灌注无显著差异(0%对5.6%,p>0.05)。两组均未发现重大围手术期并发症。两组之间使用的荧光透视时间(Nester:15.0+/-11.8分钟vs.IDC 16.0+/-5.4分钟,p>0.05)和对比体积(Nester:80.3+/-36.5毫升vs.IDC 87.3+/-51.7毫升,p>0.05)没有差异。结论IDC和Nester线圈栓塞后,PAVM再灌注率、围手术期并发症发生率、对比剂体积利用率或透视时间均无显著差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号