...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology: A Journal of Imaging in Diagnosis and Treatment >Initial Experience with the E-liac ? Iliac Branch Device for the Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aorto-iliac Aneurysm
【24h】

Initial Experience with the E-liac ? Iliac Branch Device for the Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aorto-iliac Aneurysm

机译:E-LIAC的初始经验? 主轴腹腔膜主动脉瘤的髂间分支装置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Purpose Occlusion of internal iliac arteries during endovascular treatment (EVAR) of abdominal aortic (AAA) and common iliac artery aneurysms might be associated with ischemic pelvic complications. This study evaluates technical and clinical success, safety and mid-term results of a novel iliac branch device (IBD) for revascularization of the internal iliac artery (IIA) during EVAR. Materials and Methods Retrospectively, we identified 21 men (mean age 73.3?±?6.2?years) treated for aorto-iliac aneurysms by use of a novel IBD (E-liac_(?), Jotec Hechingen, Germany). We analyzed safety (30-day survival), technical (no type I and III endoleaks, “EL”), clinical (no ischemic complications) success, mid-term patency of this IBD, peri-procedural complications, occurrence of type II ELs, rate of re-interventions and additional treatment of the revascularized IIA for landing zone preparation. Results Twenty-three IBDs were implanted. Aneurysms of the ipsilateral IIA were present in 6/23 IIAs (26.1%). Super-selective branch embolization was performed in these patients?and the landing zone for the iliac sidebranch stent-graft was within the superior gluteal artery. Mean follow-up was 341?days (range 4–1103?days). Technical success and 30-day survival were 100%. Clinical success was 95.2%. Primary patency of the IBDs was 100% at 12 months. Peri-procedural complications occurred in 3/21 patients (14.3%), none of them related to the IBD. AAA-related type II ELs were found in 6 patients (28.6%), IBD-related ELs in 4/23 IBDs (17.4%) (two type Ib, two type II endoleaks). Overall re-intervention rate was 23.8%, IBD-related 8.7%. Conclusion Utilization of the E-liac_(?)IBD is safe and effective for the treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms.
机译:摘要目的腹主动脉(AAA)和髂总动脉瘤血管内治疗(EVAR)期间,髂内动脉闭塞可能与缺血性骨盆并发症有关。本研究评估了新型髂分支装置(IBD)在EVAR期间用于髂内动脉(IIA)血运重建的技术和临床成功率、安全性和中期结果。材料和方法回顾性分析21名男性(平均年龄73.3?±6.2?岁)使用新型IBD(E-liac?)治疗主髂动脉瘤,Jotec Hechingen,德国)。我们分析了安全性(30天生存期)、技术性(无I型和III型内漏)、临床(无缺血性并发症)成功率、IBD的中期通畅率、围手术期并发症、II型ELs的发生率、再干预率以及为着陆区准备对血管化IIA进行的额外治疗。结果共植入IBD 23例。23例IIA中有6例(26.1%)出现同侧IIA动脉瘤。这些患者是否进行了超选择性分支栓塞?髂骨侧支支架移植物的着落区位于臀上动脉内。平均随访341次?天数(范围为4-1103天)。技术成功率和30天生存率均为100%。临床成功率为95.2%。在12个月时,IBDs的主要通畅率为100%。21例患者中有3例(14.3%)发生围手术期并发症,均与IBD无关。6例患者(28.6%)发现AAA相关II型ELs,4/23 IBD患者(17.4%)发现IBD相关ELs(两例Ib,两例II型内漏)。总体再干预率为23.8%,与IBD相关的再干预率为8.7%。结论E-liac_(?)的利用IBD治疗主髂动脉瘤安全有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号