...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Impact of aerosol box on intubation during COVID-19: a simulation study of normal and difficult airways
【24h】

Impact of aerosol box on intubation during COVID-19: a simulation study of normal and difficult airways

机译:气溶胶箱对Covid-19期间插管的影响:正常和困难气道的仿真研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose Patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are at risk of requiring mechanical ventilation, and concerns of protecting healthcare workers during aerosol-generating medical procedures has led to the design of the aerosol box. Methods We conducted a randomized crossover mannequin-based simulation study to compare airway management with and without the aerosol box. Thirty-five anesthesiology participants and three critical care participants with more than 50 intubations with videolaryngoscopes were recruited. There were four airway simulations with and without the aerosol box (normal, pharyngeal swelling, cervical spine rigidity, and tongue edema). Each participant intubated the mannequin in eight consecutive simulations. The primary outcome of the study was time to intubation. Secondary outcomes included intubation attempts, optimization maneuvers, and personal protective equipment breaches. Results Mean (standard deviation [SD]) time to intubation overall with the box was 30.9 (23.0) sec, while the time to intubation without the box was 25.1 (12.2) sec (mean difference, 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.9 to 14.5). For the normal airway scenario, the mean (SD) time to intubation was 18.6 (3.5) sec for no box and 20.4 (3.3) sec for box (mean difference, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.2 to 3.4). During difficult airway scenarios only, the time to intubation was 34.4 (25.6) sec with the aerosol box and 27.3 (13.2) sec without the aerosol box (mean difference, 7.1; 95% CI, -2.5 to 16.7). There were more intubation attempts, personal protective equipment breaches, and optimization maneuvers during use of the aerosol box. Conclusions In this mannequin-based simulation study, the use of the aerosol box increased the time to intubation in some contexts but not others. Further studies in a clinical setting should be conducted to make appropriate modifications to the aerosol box to fully elicit its efficacy and safety prior to implementation in airway guidelines for managing patients with COVID-19.
机译:目的:冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者有需要机械通气的风险,在产生气雾剂的医疗程序中保护医护人员的担忧导致了气雾盒的设计。方法我们进行了一项基于随机交叉人体模型的模拟研究,比较使用和不使用气溶胶盒的气道管理。招募了35名麻醉学参与者和3名重症监护参与者,他们使用视频喉镜进行了50多次插管。使用和不使用气溶胶盒进行了四次气道模拟(正常、咽部肿胀、颈椎僵硬和舌头水肿)。每个参与者在八个连续模拟中对人体模型进行插管。该研究的主要结果是插管时间。次要结果包括插管尝试、优化操作和违反个人防护装备。结果带盒插管的平均时间(标准差[SD])为30.9(23.0)秒,而不带盒插管的平均时间为25.1(12.2)秒(平均差为5.8;95%可信区间[CI],-2.9至14.5)。在正常气道情况下,无box的平均(SD)插管时间为18.6(3.5)秒,box为20.4(3.3)秒(平均差异为1.8;95%可信区间为0.2至3.4)。仅在困难的气道情况下,使用气雾盒插管的时间为34.4(25.6)秒,不使用气雾盒插管的时间为27.3(13.2)秒(平均差7.1;95%可信区间-2.5至16.7)。在使用气溶胶盒期间,有更多的插管尝试、个人防护设备泄漏和优化操作。结论在这项基于人体模型的模拟研究中,气溶胶盒的使用在某些情况下增加了插管时间,但在其他情况下没有增加。在2019冠状病毒疾病患者气道指南中,应在临床上进行进一步研究,以对气溶胶盒作出适当的修改,以充分发挥其疗效和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号