首页> 外文期刊>Burns: Including Thermal Injury >A non-inferiority study comparing efficacy of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infectious complications in patients with less severe burns
【24h】

A non-inferiority study comparing efficacy of preoperative prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infectious complications in patients with less severe burns

机译:比较术前预防性抗生素治疗患者患者患者的疗效的非劣粒度研究比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While international burn injury guidelines discourage prophylactic antibiotics on admission, current surgery guidelines focusing on antimicrobial prophylaxis place thermal injury under a general plastics procedure umbrella, and require significant evidential extrapolation. The purpose of this study was to determine if withholding systemic antibiotics in patients with <20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns without invasive wound infections and undergo wound excision is non-inferior to patients that receive preoperative antibiotics. Success was defined as lack of graft loss, bacteremia, or surgical site infection. One-thousand and eightythree patients were screened and 100 patients undergoing 133 operations remained after exclusions. Seventy-four percent were male. Median age and %TBSA was 41 years (30, 55) and 5 (1.5, 8.3), respectively. We found no differences in demographics between patients that did and did not receive preoperative antibiotics. The success rates were 81.7% and 84.3%, respectively. There was one clinically significant bacteremia in each group. Withholding preoperative antibiotics was non-inferior with a percent difference of 2.6 (95% CI;-10.4, 15.6). Patients that did not receive antibiotics were no more likely to incur infection-related complications. In patients with <20% TBSA burns and without active wound infections, withholding preoperative systemic antibiotics will preserve unneeded antimicrobial exposure without increasing risk of infection-related complications. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
机译:虽然国际烧伤指南不鼓励入院时使用预防性抗生素,但目前侧重于抗生素预防的外科指南将热损伤置于一般整形手术的保护伞下,需要大量证据推断。本研究的目的是确定全身表面积(TBSA)小于20%的烧伤患者在没有侵入性伤口感染的情况下保留全身抗生素,并进行伤口切除,是否不低于术前接受抗生素治疗的患者。成功的定义是没有移植物丢失、菌血症或手术部位感染。筛查了183名患者,排除后仍有100名患者接受了133次手术。74%是男性。中位年龄和TBSA百分比分别为41岁(30,55)和5岁(1.5,8.3)。我们发现术前服用和未服用抗生素的患者在人口统计学上没有差异。成功率分别为81.7%和84.3%。两组中各有一例有临床意义的菌血症。术前不使用抗生素并不差,差异为2.6%(95%CI;-10.4,15.6)。未使用抗生素的患者不太可能出现感染相关并发症。在TBSA烧伤<20%且无活动性伤口感染的患者中,保留术前全身抗生素将保留不必要的抗生素暴露,而不会增加感染相关并发症的风险。(c) 2020爱思唯尔有限公司和ISBI。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号