...
首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine and Lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (Cituxumumab) in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy: NCCTG N0733 (Alliance)
【24h】

Randomized Phase II Trial of Capecitabine and Lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (Cituxumumab) in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Previously Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy: NCCTG N0733 (Alliance)

机译:在以前用Trastuzumab和化疗以前治疗的Her2阳性晚期乳腺癌的患者中,Capecitabine和Lapatinib的随机阶段II试验,患有IMC-A12(Cituxumumab):NCCTG N0733(联盟)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose To compare efficacy and safety of capecitabine and lapatinib with or without IMC-A12 (cituxumumab) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab. Patients and methods Following an initial safety run-in cohort, patients were randomized 1:2 to Arm A (capecitabine and lapatinib) or to Arm B (capecitabine, lapatinib, and cituxumumab). Given the frequency of non-hematologic grade >= 3 adverse events in those receiving the three-drug combination in the safety cohort, lapatinib and capecitabine doses were reduced in Arm B only. The primary objective was to determine if the addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with capecitabine and lapatinib. Secondary objectives included a comparison between arms of other clinical endpoints, safety, change in overall quality of life (QOL) and self-assessed fatigue, rash, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome. Results From July 2008 to March 2012, 68 patients (out of 142 planned) were enrolled and 63 were evaluable, including 8 for the safety run-in and 55 for the randomized cohort. Study enrollment was stopped early due to slow accrual. The addition of cituxumumab to capecitabine and lapatinib did not improve PFS (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.52-1.64). Furthermore, no difference in objective response rate or overall survival (OS) was observed. No difference between arms was observed in grade >= 3 adverse events, overall QOL change from baseline after 4 cycles of treatment. Conclusion The addition of cituxumumab to lapatinib and capecitabine did not improve PFS or OS compared with lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with HER2-positive MBC.
机译:目的,将Capecitabine和Lapatinib的疗效和安全性与以前用曲妥珠单抗治疗的Her2阳性转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的IMC-A12(Cituxumumab)进行比较。患者和方法后初始安全循环队列,患者随机1:2臂A(Capecitabine和Lapatinib)或ARM B(Capecitabine,Lapatinib和Cituxumumab)。鉴于非血液学级的频率> = 3在接受安全队列中的三种药物组合的那些中,只有在臂B中减少了Lapatinib和Capecitabine剂量。主要目的是确定与Capecitabine和Lapatinib相比加入Capecitumab和Lapatinib的加入无进展的存活(PFS)。次要目标包括其他临床终点,安全性,生活质量(QOL)和自我评估疲劳,皮疹,腹泻和手足综合征的武器之间的比较。结果2008年7月至2012年3月,68名患者(142名计划)注册,63名评估,其中8例为安全运行和55例,为随机队列。由于慢速应迟到,研究报名早期停止。将Cituxumumab添加到Capecitabine和Lapatinib未改善PFS(HR 0.93,95%CI:0.52-1.64)。此外,观察到客观响应率或整体存活(OS)的差异。在级别> = 3个不良事件中观察到武器之间没有差异,4个治疗循环后的基线总体QOL变化。结论将Cituxumumab与Lapatinib和Capecitabine的加入与Her2阳性MBC患者的Lapatinib和Capecitabine相比没有改善PFS或OS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号