...
首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >Efficacy and safety of fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

机译:氟斯特语在绝经后患者激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者的疗效和安全性:系统文献综述和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PurposeThis meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive) advanced breast cancer.MethodsElectronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant with three aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole/letrozole/exemestane) published through August 31, 2017. Time to progression/progression-free survival was the primary outcome, while overall survival and safety were the secondary outcomes. Time to progression/progression-free survival was evaluated in subgroups determined on age, hormone receptor status, visceral metastasis, and measurable disease. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were analyzed by STATA 12.0.ResultsTotal of seven randomized controlled trials, with 3168 patients were included for analysis. In the overall population, fulvestrant and aromatase inhibitors had similar time to progression/progression-free survival (Hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.01, P=0.102); however, time to progression/progression-free survival for fulvestrant 500mg was significantly longer compared with aromatase inhibitors (hazard ratio 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.91, P=0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed significant prolongation of time to progression/progression-free survival with fulvestrant compared with aromatase inhibitors in the patients of estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive (hazard ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.98, P=0.022) and patients aged65years (hazard ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.96, P=0.014). Overall survival was similar in both groups (hazard ratio 0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.70, 1.13, P=0.334).ConclusionIn postmenopausal women with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, fulvestrant 500mg showed better efficacy than aromatase inhibitor, which was not seen with fulvestrant 250mg. Compared to aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant prolonged time to progression/progression-free survival in the subgroups including estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive patients and those aged65years.
机译:进行了预防富士雌肽抑制剂的预防蛋白酶阳性(雌激素和/或雌激素受体受体阳性)晚期乳腺癌的芳香糖酶抑制剂的疗效和安全性。在评估疗效和疗效和通过2017年8月31日发表的三种芳香酶抑制剂(Anastrozole / Letrozole / Exemestane)的安全性。进展/无进展的存活时间是主要结果,而总体生存和安全性是二次结果。在年龄,激素受体状态,内脏转移和可衡量疾病确定的亚组中评价进展/进展存活的时间。通过STATA 12.0.4.0分析了95%置信区间的危险比。七项随机对照试验的培训比例,包括3168名患者进行分析。在整体群体中,氟斯特语和芳香酶抑制剂具有类似的进展/进展存活时间(危害比0.93; 95%置信区间0.86-1.01,P = 0.102);然而,与芳香糖酶抑制剂(危险比0.75; 95%置信区间0.62-0.91,P = 0.003)比较富氯苯甲特兰500mg的进展/进展生存时间明显更长。亚组分析显示,与雌激素和孕酮受体阳性患者的芳香酶抑制剂(危险比0.86; 95%置信区间,0.75-0.98,P = 0.022)和患者的芳香酶抑制剂(危险比0.86; 95%置信区间,0.75-0.98,p = 0.022)和患者(0.75-0.98,p = 0.022)和患者,亚氟雌肽与氟苯乙烯酶抑制剂相比,与氟苯乙烯酶抑制剂相比显着延长了aged65年(危险比0.81; 95%置信区间0.68-0.96,p = 0.014)。两组的整体存活率(危险比0.89; 95%置信区间0.70,1.13,p = 0.334)。蛋白酶蛋白患者患有雌激素和/或孕酮受体阳性晚期乳腺癌,氟斯特兰500mg表现出比芳香酶抑制剂更好的疗效,富士斯特斯特朗特250毫克没有看到。与芳香酶抑制剂相比,氟斯特朗渴的时间延长亚组的进展/无进展生存期,包括雌激素和孕酮受体阳性患者和那些年龄65年的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号