首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Comparison of immunosuppressant regimens in salvage cord blood transplantation for graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
【24h】

Comparison of immunosuppressant regimens in salvage cord blood transplantation for graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

机译:同种异体造血干细胞移植后移植物胸腔血液移植中免疫抑制剂方案的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Graft failure (GF) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Although salvage cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a curative therapy for GF, the optimal immunosuppression after salvage CBT remains unknown. Using nationwide registration data, we compared the transplant outcomes of patients who developed GF and underwent salvage CBT using immunosuppressants, including calcineurin (CNI) alone (n = 177); CNI plus methotrexate (CNI+MTX,n = 150); and CNI plus mycophenolate mofetil (CNI+MMF,n = 161). The CNI+MMF group, in comparison with the CNI+MTX and CNI alone groups, demonstrated better neutrophil recovery at 30 days (62.7 vs. 42.7 vs. 53.1%,P < 0.001); better overall survival (OS) at 12 months (48.4 vs. 33.5 vs. 28.3%,P < 0.001); and lower non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 12 months (35.2 vs. 53.9 vs. 56.5%,P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, CNI+MMF had the best neutrophil recovery (hazard ratio (HR), 1.71;P < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.64;P = 0.002) and the lowest NRM (HR, 0.53;P < 0.001). Hemorrhage was relatively less frequent in the CNI+MMF group. CNI+MMF can be a promising immunosuppressant regimen after salvage CBT for GF, with better engraftment and survival outcomes, compared with CNI alone and CNI+MTX.
机译:移植物失败(GF)是同种异体干细胞移植后危及生命的并发症。虽然挽救脐带血移植(CBT)是GF的治疗方法,但救助后的最佳免疫抑制仍然未知。使用全国范围的注册数据,我们将开发GF的患者的移植结果与单独使用免疫抑制剂(包括钙素(CNI)(N = 177))进行比较。 CNI加甲氨蝶呤(CNI + MTX,N = 150);和CNI加霉霉素MofeTil(CNI + MMF,N = 161)。与CNI + MTX和CNI单独组相比,CNI + MMF组在30天(62.7 vs.22.7与53.1%,P <0.001)显示了更好的中性粒细胞恢复; 12个月的整体存活(OS)更好(48.4与33.5与28.3%,P <0.001); 12个月(35.2与53.9与56.5%,P <0.001)下较低的非复发死亡率(NRM)。在多变量分析中,CNI + MMF具有最佳的中性粒细胞恢复(危险比(HR),1.71; P <0.001)和OS(HR,0.64; P = 0.002)和最低NRM(HR,0.53; P <0.001)。在CNI + MMF组中出血频率相对较小。与单独的CNI和CNI + MTX相比,CNI + MMF可以是PATVATE CBT后的有前途的免疫抑制剂方案,具有更好的植入和存活结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bone marrow transplantation》 |2021年第2期|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Tokai Univ Dept Hematol &

    Oncol Sch Med Isehara Kanagawa Japan;

    Osaka Int Canc Inst Dept Hematol Osaka Japan;

    Dokkyo Med Univ Dept Hematol &

    Oncol Sch Med Mibu Tochigi Japan;

    Toranomon Gen Hosp Dept Hematol Federat Natl Publ Serv Personnel Mutual Aid Assoc Tokyo Japan;

    Natl Hosp Org Dept Hematol Kumamoto Med Ctr Kumamoto Japan;

    Jikei Univ Clin Oncol &

    Hematol Sch Med Tokyo Japan;

    Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hosp Dept Hematol Nagoya Aichi Japan;

    Kobe City Med Ctr Gen Hosp Dept Hematol Kobe Hyogo Japan;

    Tohoku Univ Hosp Dept Hematol &

    Rheumatol Sendai Miyagi Japan;

    Komagome Hosp Tokyo Metropolitan Canc &

    Infect Dis Ctr Hematol Div Tokyo Japan;

    Tokai Univ Dept Hematol &

    Oncol Sch Med Isehara Kanagawa Japan;

    Kawasaki Med Sch Hosp Dept Hematol Kurashiki Okayama Japan;

    Japanese Red Cross Kinki Block Blood Ctr Preparat Dept Ibaraki Japan;

    Hiroshima Univ Res Inst Radiat Biol &

    Med Dept Hematol &

    Oncol Hiroshima Japan;

    Japanese Data Ctr Hematopoiet Cell Transplantat Nagoya Aichi Japan;

    Nagoya Univ Dept Hematol &

    Oncol Grad Sch Med Nagoya Aichi Japan;

    Jichi Med Univ Div Hematol Saitama Med Ctr Saitama Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 治疗学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号