首页> 外文期刊>Biosystems Engineering >Prediction of human odour assessments based on hedonic tone method using instrument measurements and multi-sensor data fusion integrated neural networks
【24h】

Prediction of human odour assessments based on hedonic tone method using instrument measurements and multi-sensor data fusion integrated neural networks

机译:利用仪器测量和多传感器数据融合综合神经网络预测人类气味评估的预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A Cyranose 320 (eNose) and a Fast Gas Chromatograph (CG) analyser (zNoseTM) were used to measure the headspace odour of solid samples from dairy operations. The measurements of both sensors were trained by Levenberg-Marquardt Back-propagation Neural Network (LMBNN) to match human assessments. A trained human panel was used to assess the odours based on hedonic tone method and provide the model targets. A multi-sensor data fusion approach was developed and applied to integrate the eNose and zNose readings for higher predictive accuracy compared to each sensor alone. Principle Component Analysis, Forward Selection, and Gamma Test were applied to reduce the model input dimensions. Measurement fusion models and information fusion model approaches were applied. The information fusion prediction models were shown to be more accurate than all other models, including single instrument models. The information fusion model based on eNose with Gamma Test data reduction thorn zNose showed the best results of all cases in validation mean square error (0.34 odour units), R value (0.92), probability of the prediction falling within 10% of the target (96%), and probability of the prediction falling within 5% of the target (63%). (C) 2020 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:含有嘧啶320(Enose)和快速气相色谱仪(CG)分析仪(Znosetm)测量来自乳制品的固体样品的顶部空气。通过Levenberg-Marquardt回播神经网络(LMBNN)训练了两个传感器的测量,以匹配人类评估。培训的人类面板用于评估基于蜂窝色调方法的气味,并提供模型目标。开发了一种多传感器数据融合方法,并应用于与单独的每个传感器相比,以实现较高的预测精度的enose和Znose读数。应用原理分析,转发选择和伽玛测试,以减少模型输入尺寸。采用测量融合模型和信息融合模型方法。显示信息融合预测模型比所有其他型号更准确,包括单一仪器模型。基于Enose的信息融合模型用伽马试验数据减少刺Znose显示了验证均方误差(0.34气味单位),R值(0.92),落在目标的10%内的预测概率( 96%),预测的概率落在目标的5%以内(63%)。 (c)2020 IAGRE。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号